Journal Editorial Report: The week's best and worst from Dan Henninger, Kim Strassel, Jason Riley and Kyle Peterson. Image: Greg Baker/AFP via Getty ImagesA commonplace assumption of American liberalism, that courts merely preside over contests of rights, conceals the judiciary’s limitless power to decide questions of truth without thinking deeply or even honestly about them. Bostock v.
Clayton County is a case in point. The ruling holds that sexual orientation and “identity” are included in the definition of “sex” under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Writing for the majority, Justice Neil Gorsuch claims it is a narrow ruling about sex discrimination in employment, leaving concerns like locker rooms and religious liberty for future litigation. Underneath this...
opinion
opinion Thank you for speaking out on a topic many are afraid to discuss. If men can ‘identify’ as women and be protected in law as women, the definition of women is no longer protected under law. Women loses everything women’s rights fought for as a basis of their SEX. Women loses.
opinion Thank for all those that are finally speaking up about gender ideology and how it affects everyone, particularly women and children.
opinion Thank you for taking a stand against the mob. Brilliant. 'There is no totalitarianism so total as that which claims authority over the meaning of nature.'
opinion What does this mean in a literal sense of it?
opinion WSJ... your opinion section seems more poised to inflame than inform these days. Seriously questioning continuing to fund this editorial team.
opinion Typical left wing crap, criticize the court because they are not left wing
opinion This opinion piece is scientifically illiterate about biological sex and gender! What a terrible straw man argument! Does opinion have ANY editors or fact checkers with brains on its staff? 🤦♀️
opinion Oh please! Another stupid opinion article from the WSJ. Sex discrimination is sex discrimination, it doesn’t matter the gender. Why can’t some people just live & let live?
opinion Radical new conception of human nature New? Who eunuchs, celibates.......
opinion WSJ opinion section becomes more comical by the day. Also, just for funsies, here is pic of my male cat named Stella (Stella the Gender Fluid Cat in hashtag form can be found on IG). We thought she was a girl when we adopted her but she ended up being a boy!
opinion dumb and dumber
opinion This was the stupidest thing Ibhave ever read.
opinion The opinion that the Supreme Court was incorrect in the decision on trans employment discrimination was ridiculous in form and substance. I would like to remind the 3 catholics who wrote this opinion that the United States is not a theocracy but a democracy.
opinion 😱😱😱
opinion The rejection of humanity might be a thing for the law but it's a crock of humbug in every other way.
opinion If I identify as an unapologetic asshole can I get a shot at writing about being a self-perceived victim of something that has zero impact on my life?
opinion Trash opinion piece
opinion Well isn’t that just a load of crap...
opinion Woohoo!
opinion My advice is to stop reading after 'we are all transgender now' and say 'YES! AMEN!'
opinion Go home, WSJ. You’re drunk.
opinion Man the logic of this opinion is so terribly nonsensical that it’s painful to read. The real question the authors should be asking is why they care so massively much. Go live your lives, let other people live theirs, it’s not that difficult
opinion What a horrendously bad take! It’s 2020. We know that gender is not binary. Unbunch your panties and worry about the real problems facing our republic.
opinion Oh, good Lord. Give the world a break from the evangelical dogma. Keep it in the pews.
opinion This has to be the most idiotic thing I have read today. And no, the Supreme Court didn't abolish man and woman, what they abolished was discrimination.
opinion good, I can get some more of those rights that everybody doesn't have
opinion Well, that WOULD explain Junior and Eric....
opinion No, the decision didn’t say that at all
opinion Oh dear god, get over your insecure selves.
opinion
opinion If a corporation can be an person, acc'd. to the Supreme Court, it's just fine for LGBTQ individuals to be protected by law. Get over it. Write something worthwhile.
opinion Hey, WSJ, I know this is the opinion section, but this is neo-nazi propaganda and absolutely filled with falsehoods. You should immediately take it down
opinion What could go wrong?!
opinion
opinion No, thanks. I'm still a dude.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Source: TeenVogue - 🏆 481. / 51 Read more »
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Source: DEADLINE - 🏆 109. / 63 Read more »