, litigant strategy, and the character and testimony of the witnesses and Rittenhouse, we might also consider what this case says about us. The laws at issue, their application and their interpretation reveal an unsettled, troubling picture of who we are.. But what does its deadly force language really mean? It means what we say it means. Social media noise matters; as folks condemn Rittenhouse, or portray him as a hero and condemn the gunshot victims, the community standard takes shape.
With open-carry becoming more prevalent, the possibility that two people, each reasonably fearing great bodily harm or death, will shoot each other increases. And now that a jury in Kenosha might find Rittenhouse justified, we are contending with a view of self-defense that transforms an active shooter into a privileged actor.
I was particularly struck by the pretrial testimony of the defense’s use-of-force expert. When asked by the prosecutor whether Rittenhouse could have used deadly force against the first, unarmed victim if Rittenhouse was also unarmed, , “no.” What is the basis of this reasoning, that an armed individual has greater discretion to use deadly force than an unarmed individual?
Not surprisingly, use-of-force experts typically testify in officer-involved shootings, and this use-of-force theory comes from
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
THINK
THINK The system did its job, self defense a human right.
THINK We've normalized more than 2 genders. We've normalized obesity which now kills more people than starvation. We've normalized underachieving. We've normalizesd hating this country. We've normalized turning everything into a race issue.
THINK What is absurd is allowing a town to be burned and looted by the wicked
THINK In an alternate – and somewhat more righteous – universe, Kyle Rittenhouse will once again insert himself, heavily armed, into a situation filled with danger. He will once again put other people in fear for their lives. This time, those other people will shoot first.
THINK What's dangerous is when there is a trial and a verdict yet you still question it. Its over and maybe it will make people think twice when participating in all these violent protests.
THINK System has failed again...
THINK The young democrats just drive a car through Waukesha's street.
THINK Although I don’t favor what happened and how they allowed him to come there armed at his age and use him as militia, I guess he was a modern version of a junior G man,but they did chase himkick him and he shot some of them, I mean, if they don’t chase and kick he don’t shoot 🤔
THINK What would you do if a pedophile kept chasing you and threatening you, the jury got it right
THINK Calling this an “opinion “. Ok does that shield from a libel suit?
THINK If you want to put a hero medal on this guy without giving consideration to the people murdered or believe “aggression is indistinguishable from self-defense” then this was just another example of …
THINK He will be facing civil suits . I hope his life is miserable .
THINK
THINK No... you have the right to defend yourself from bodily harm. Period!
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TMZ - 🏆 379. / 59 Read more »
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Source: TODAYshow - 🏆 389. / 55 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »