Opinion | Calling All Trial Witnesses

  • 📰 WSJ
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 12 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 8%
  • Publisher: 63%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

From WSJopinion: We doubt Democrats want to hear from Hunter and Joe Biden, writes The Editorial Board

The Senate impeachment trial began Tuesday with political theater over rules. Senate Republicans prefer an expeditious trial while Democrats who rushed to impeach in the House are suddenly demanding witnesses and crying “coverup.” So let’s break down what’s really going on in the fight over witnesses.

By our deadline, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell looked set to keep his caucus together for his organizing resolution. His framework provides Democratic House impeachment managers 24 hours over three working days to make their...

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

opinion Talk about opening a can of worms. All the skeletons will come out. DC, dirtball central

opinion Why would they? The Biden’s corruption allegations are irrelevant to the case. Two separate problems.

opinion The Bidens are irrelevant to this trial. Overwhelming evidence demonstrates that this is a red herring, and Trump's actions were serious enough to have him removed from office.

opinion How would that event be relavent to the case...If Joe gets elected look out Trump. It will be Joe on the impeachment trial for abuse of power getting into Trump's life. Flip flop. Power is not meant to be abused in such nature..

opinion Probably because they aren't relevant to the impeachment hearing.

opinion WHY are there so many stupid takes from Editorial Boards? Their testimony is irrelevant to the impeachment trial. Stop doing Trump’s work for him; unless, of course, that’s your goal.

opinion WSJ always with the Trump propaganda. Given up all pretenses of impartial journalism. It's not about the Biden's, it's about abuse of power. Let's hear from actual witnesses to the ' perfect call ' have them testify under oath.

opinion It would be irrelevant. The Bidens should probably be investigated. There is a right way to do that. This wasn't the way. That is what this is about. Guilty or not, they had a right as does every American to the due process of law.

opinion How ignorant can you be! I realize your desperate to find a way out for the worst president ever. The Biden issue has no bearing on what trump has done! politico cnni Salon AP MotherJones MSNBC HuffPost Slate nytimes BBCWorld washingtonpost bpolitics thedailybeast

opinion why should anyone? Did they force Donald to withhold military funds? Did they force Donald to obstruct Congress by withholding documents and witnesses?

opinion Aside from the fact that their testimony isn't the least bit relevant, Democrats rightly fear that Republicans will use the testimony to keep laying down a fog of confusion to avoid coming to the only correct conclusion...that Trump abused the power of his office.

opinion Neither Biden is relevant to the articles of impeachment. Graham started a senate investigation into Biden's back in November.

opinion Again, they could be guilty of everything they were accused of and it would justify the steps taken by Trump. opinion is THE WORST

opinion Hardly relevant, unless you are regurgitating the GOP playbook of deflection & projection!

opinion What a bunch of traitorous sycophants at this paper, playing silly games with their articles all while the foundations of republic are eroded. For what? A tax cut? Pathetic

opinion costareports This was the most really honest thing you have said! Truth is served by access to our senators and should not be fettered!

opinion I’m not going to click, but assume this is another one of their whack job right wing wackos commenting.

opinion They have no relevance at all to the trial.

opinion The Biden's aren't relevant to realDonaldTrump's bribery crimes with Ukraine! RemoveTrump IMPOTUS45Forever

opinion They are not relevant to the proceedings. Period.

opinion Hunter Biden could answer every question saying if he did anything wrong, why hasn’t the DOJ investigated him rather than asking Ukraine.

opinion The proper place for Hunter Biden is you believe trump and Fox News would have been the FBI. Why didn’t trump go there? I think we all know the answer!

opinion We doubt Republicans and WSJ Editorial Board want to hear from anybody who could offer actual substantive evidence in the case, writes Everybody.

opinion Please make the case for relevancy of any testimony they might give.

opinion I’d like to hear what Hunter Biden has to say ..

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 98. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Republicans hold the cards at Trump's impeachment trial — but that could changeThe Senate impeachment trial of President Trump will begin in earnest this afternoon with a tussle between Republicans and Democrats over whether witnesses should be called immediately. Democrats plan to swiftly force several votes on subpoenaing witnesses — votes that Republicans have pledged to band together to defeat. This trial will be anything but “earnest.” Mitch has already declared it will be a farce. Reporting should not pretend he is operating in good faith. He is not. He is working WITH the defense. The corrupt republicans don’t hold any good cards -there is no defense of the criminal impeached trump!!!!!!!!
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

71% of Republicans want Mitch McConnell to call witnesses at Trump impeachment trial, new poll showsA new poll shows that 71 percent of Republicans believe that witnesses should testify during Trump's impeachment trial. 98% of Americans want to stop making up bullshit polls and numbers... What was it 93% chance of Hillary winning, maybe Newsweek staff don't know how numbers actually work. Fake news. Bye Bye Mcconnell - those 71% are Republicans - who could quickly become Democrats in the face of such corruption!
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Trump impeachment: Senate debates rules of trial, calling of witnessesThe Senate impeachment trial of President Trump resumed Tuesday with a fight over the fairness of proposed rules to govern the proceeding. Moscow Mitch has sold our Country for $1.00 Dems should all walk out and have nothing more to do with this blatant partisan coverup. The whole thing is a joke. Will history judge this as a historicalsham or a FairTrial - either way the jurors are out and will take a few months to decide but decide they will in November2020 NovemberIsComing -
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Senate Dem weighs possibility of Biden for BoltonSen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, discusses her thoughts on the possibility of VP Biden's son, Hunter, as a witness if it means Democrats will get their wish of speaking with former national security adviser John Bolton' He is relevant. Hunter Biden testifying to Trumps call with the President of Ukraine? Why not put the President of Ukraine before all? What law did Hunter Biden break and how are Ivanka and Kushner not actively breaking nepotism laws right now as we speak?
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Democrats Reportedly Discuss Swapping Testimony of Hunter Biden for John BoltonThe strategy was proven relevant on day one of the impeachment trial, when Republicans blocked amendments proposing that witnesses be called amendments were pure theater DOA They better do it ! I don’t like this one bit. Offering up a sacrificial lamb to America’s traitors.
Source: NYMag - 🏆 111. / 63 Read more »

Former FBI Assistant Director Frank Figliuzzi says Parnas is unlikely to be a witness in Senate impeachment trialFormer FBI Assistant Director for Counterintelligence and MSNBC National Security Analyst Frank Figliuzzi says to expect impeachment managers to work in the new information and documentation from Lev Parnas but not to see him on the witness stand FrankFigliuzzi1 If they want the truth then by god he should FrankFigliuzzi1 That is because he is a joke! FrankFigliuzzi1 parnas has nothing but a.s.s.--allegations speculations smoke. parnas is not a fact witness; has no first hand knowledge of ukraine call; has never talked w/trump abt ukraine. all parnas have r hearsay, presumptions, n a.s.s.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »