Your story on the pitfalls of Senate Bill 10 — which would allow up to 10 rental units on a single-family lot — correctly notes many reasons why the city of San Diego should not implement this flawed housing policy.
But there’s another, crucially important reason why our City Council should just say “no” to SB 10. Hidden in the state law’s fine print is code requiring that if our City Council implements SB 10, future councils can never reduce the zoning density on parcels once they are made eligible for SB 10. Those lots will forever be allowed to have one housing unit per 1,000 square feet of lot size.
Such policies make a mockery of proper land-use planning, which must always remain fluid and react wisely to changing housing goals and environmental concerns. We should all oppose any land-use legislation that bars reconsideration of the real-world impacts of zoning changes.
Will San Diegans wait until SB 10 is voted into law and watch their home values drop? Or until fire and safety response times increase so drastically that people die? When there aren’t enough schools, parks and recreation centers for their children? Or when residents no longer recognize their neighborhoods because they appear more like a hodge-podge of concrete and cars?
San Diego is the only city in the state foolish enough to opt into SB 10. That might bode well for developers, but it would come at an enormous cost to city residents.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Source: FOX4 - 🏆 289. / 63 Read more »
Source: nbcsandiego - 🏆 524. / 51 Read more »
Source: WTVYNews4 - 🏆 590. / 51 Read more »
Source: dallasnews - 🏆 18. / 71 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »