OK Supreme Court Rejects Lawsuit Filed by Survivors of Tulsa Race Massacre

  • 📰 AllSidesNow
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 34 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 51%

United States Headlines News

See multiple perspectives from Reuters, Fox News Digital, and CNN Digital at AllSides.com.

It is estimated that over 300 people were killed and thousands were left homeless in 1921 when a white mob attacked and burned Tulsa’s Greenwood neighborhood, an affluent black community known as “Black Wall Street.” Lessie Benningfield Randle, 108, Viola Fletcher, 109, and Hughes Van Ellis, 102, are living survivors of the massacre and were among the plaintiffs in the case. The plaintiffs argued that the massacre amounted to a “public nuisance.

Contemporary reports of deaths began at 36, but historians now believe as many as 300 people may have died, according to the Tulsa Historical Society and Museum. Thousands...Oklahoma's highest court on Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit by the last two known living survivors of the Tulsa race massacre in 1921 seeking reparations for the violence and destruction that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of Black people.

The nine-member Oklahoma Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit of the last two survivors of the riot, ruling that the plaintiff’s grievances, although legitimate, did not fall within the scope of the state’s public nuisance statute.

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 572. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rejects payday lenders' challenge to Obama-era consumer protection bureauSupreme Court rejects a conservative challenge to the U.S. agency that protects consumers from financial scams.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects challenge to FDA’s approval of mifepristoneThe court said that the challengers had no right to be in court at all since they could not show they had suffered any actual injury from the FDA rules.
Source: AKpublicnews - 🏆 387. / 55 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects challenge to abortion pill accessibilityThe court said that the challengers, a group called the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, had no right to be in court at all since neither the organization nor its members could show they had suffered any concrete injury.
Source: KPBSnews - 🏆 240. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects limits on abortion pill mifepristoneMifepristone is used in medication abortion, the most common method of ending pregnancies in the US.
Source: bbchealth - 🏆 143. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court rejects attempt to trademark ‘Trump Too Small’The Biden administration asked the justices to uphold the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s decision to deny the patent application from attorney Steve Elster
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court rejects Texas challenge to abortion pillIn the high court’s first abortion-related ruling since it overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, the justices ruled unanimously to change nothing about mifepristone’s legal status.
Source: TexasTribune - 🏆 441. / 53 Read more »