claims that the article “selectively refers to previously-reported contacts between a Russian lawyer and persons connected with the campaign.”
The Trump campaign claims that the article “insinuates that these contacts must have resulted in a quid pro quo or a deal, and the defamatory article does not acknowledge that, in fact, there had been extensive reporting, including in The Times, that the meetings and contacts that the defamatory article refers to did not result in any quid pro quo or deal between the Campaign and Russia, or anyone connected with either of them.
A spokesperson for the Times said, “The Trump Campaign has turned to the courts to try to punish an opinion writer for having an opinion they find unacceptable. Fortunately, the law protects the right of Americans to express their judgments and conclusions, especially about events of public importance. We look forward to vindicating that right in this case.”
The campaign is represented by Charles Harder, who has represented Donald and Melania Trump in other legal threats and libel actions.
Guess trump doesn’t understand what Op-Ed means... no case here. Lol.
Gonna be a lot more of this coming. It’s a distraction designed to curb factual reporting.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »
K-Pop Group BTS Performs New Single 'ON' in New York City's Grand Central TerminalBTS also made a visit to the Big Apple's Katz's Deli, and went for a ride on the N.Y.C. subway BTSxFlorida BTS_twt When I say BTS, you say legends 🙌🏻 msbeatrice_81 BTS_twt very much like king behavior! stream 'on' now msbeatrice_81 BTS_twt BTSonFallon
Source: people - 🏆 712. / 51 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »