” so often that at one point she covered her exposed shoulders with paint and sat in protest in the school cafeteria.@naptown_thrifts
“My daughter needed to get pants for school... in the girls’ section we’ve got these nice, stretchy, very thin leggings.” Alston pulls a navy pants leg between her hands before reaching for the comparable garment that she found in the boy’s department. She describes the boys’ pants as “durable” and notes the drawstring waist and reinforced knees.
,” according to the mega-chain’s website, is “made for maximum comfort, versatility, and durability,” and “designed with his active and adventurous lifestyle in mind.”available for girls are named “Bloom Shakalaka” and “Sunday Strut,” and they come in floral and pink, respectively. You can’t make this stuff up.
Surprise! She found that girls’ shorts options were less durable, more expensive, and shorter than the ones in the boys’ section. Particularly galling to Alston was the lack of pockets in the girl’s designs.
Target maybe having unisex clothing for kids school uniforms. If you push the manufacturer they will listen.
letclothesbe let clothes be clothes campaign on this issue...
Good! Honestly the government needs our kids. We should be sent unisex clothes every 6-8 months. Stores should just supply specialty clothing
When my twins were toddlers it was ridiculous to see the exact same size had such a difference in lengths. Tapered shirts that were much shorter for her and big baggy ones for him.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Source: RollingStone - 🏆 483. / 51 Read more »
Source: PageSix - 🏆 320. / 59 Read more »
Source: PageSix - 🏆 320. / 59 Read more »
Source: nypost - 🏆 91. / 67 Read more »