Massachusetts court rules Harvard can be sued for distress over slave photos

  • 📰 ALNewsNetwork
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 27 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 14%
  • Publisher: 51%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The court concluded Tamara Lanier can plausibly make a case for suffering 'negligent and indeed reckless infliction of emotional distress'

from Tamara Lanier over photos she says depict her enslaved ancestors. The images are considered some of the earliest showing enslaved people in the U.S.for suffering"negligent and indeed reckless infliction of emotional distress" from Harvard, and remanded that part of their claim to the state Superior Court.

"A descendant of someone whose likeness is reproduced in a daguerreotype would not therefore inherit any property right to that daguerreotype," the high court wrote in its ruling. "We are gratified by the Massachusetts Supreme Court's historic ruling in Tamara Lanier's case against Harvard University for the horrible exploitation of her Black ancestors, as this ruling will give Ms. Lanier her day in court to advocate for the memory of Renty," attorneys Ben Crump and Josh Koskoff said Thursday.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

ilda_anderson24 'Lanier's suit, which was filed in 2019, deals with a series of 1850 daguerreotypes depicting a South Carolina man identified as Renty Taylor and his daughter, Delia Taylor.' 'daguerreotypes'

Can Harvard be sued for discriminating against Asians?

ThePerezHilton

Lol, hilarious.

Stop trying to erase history.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 583. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court rules out suing police for Miranda violationsThe Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement officers can’t be sued when they violate the rights of criminal suspects by failing to provide the familiar Miranda warning before questioning them. Too bad we can't sue Judges and Prosecutors... 'Nuff said!!!... Wow, well I used to live in a country of laws. I guess I don’t anymore.
Source: FOX10Phoenix - 🏆 83. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court Rules Out Suing Police For Miranda ViolationsThe court ruled in favor of a sheriff's deputy who was sued after he failed to read a Miranda warning to a hospital worker accused of sexually assaulting a patient.
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »

Supreme Court rules Maine's exclusion of religious schools from state tuition program is unconstitutionalThe court ruled 6-3 along ideological lines. It's about time parents should be able to educate their under there religious values just like my parents did. And so glad my dad and mom did right for my sake. That’s great news! This is terrible news. NO more constatation. Soon the Baptist will make it illegal for other religion's to exist. That's why we had separation of church and state.
Source: ALNewsNetwork - 🏆 583. / 51 Read more »

Two Michigan pro-life centers vandalized as attacks spike ahead of Supreme Court rulingRadical pro-choice extremists have claimed responsibility for attacks on two pro-life pregnancy centers in Michigan as vandalism surges ahead of an anticipated Supreme Court ruling on abortion. What on earth is a 'Gang of Criminal Queers'? And what is the point in attacking women's clinics? People that attack prob life centers or abortion clinics are just waste of air humans that need to be locked away for the betterment of society as a whole. I'm sharing this because this was exactly how i saw so many posts about GregoryLillian5 and how she was helping individuals with their crypto trades and i decided to give it a try and luckly it went well, Contact her via his profile link below 👇👇 GregoryLillian5
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court Rules Against New York's Gun Permit LawThe Supreme Court ruled against a New York law that restricts who can carry a firearm in public in a 6-3 decision that comes weeks after 19 children and two teachers were fatally shot in an Uvalde, Texas, school. The court decided whether denying a concealed-carry license for self-defense violated the Second Amendment. Supreme Court decisions in 2008 and 2010… Love it
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »


Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »