that they targeted African-American voters with illegal robocalls to deter them from voting, and were fined more than $5 million.
Doe’s attorney, John Flood, did not respond to multiple requests for comment. A Johns Hopkins spokesperson did not return a message sent late Monday afternoon.aping NBC’s venerable true crime show,“We are doing hard hitting investigative journalism to expose predators in the heart of our nation's capital,”, who were charged a minimum of $10 a month to tune in. “Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman conduct hidden-camera sting operations to expose predators who work within the highest levels of the U.
“Thereafter, Defendants Wohl and Burkman—with cameras rolling and in a very aggressive manner—accused of coming to the residence, intending to have sex with an underage teen,” claiming that “Sarah” was just 16, the lawsuit states. “In response, explained repeatedly that he was coming to meet Sarah, age 36. After several minutes of heated discussion, stated that he would call the police, because what they had done to him was wrong and illegal.
The video also improperly described Doe as a married man, which the suit says Wohl believed “after seeing a photo of online, in which was wearing his Marine Corps dress blues with his wife at that time, who was African American,” the suit says. “However, was no longer married at the time of the incident in question, on August 29, 2021, or subsequent thereto on February 16, 2022, when the video was publicized.
“Hiding behind their falsely created identity, they requested personal information about work, and advised them that he had contacted the FBI,” the lawsuit states. “Thereafter, suddenly lost his job at John’s Hopkins University, for no justifiable reason. Upon information and belief, this occurred because Defendants Wohl and Burkman contacted Johns Hopkins University and falsely told them that they had documentation of their employee engaging in illegal conduct.
Further, the suit states, under Maryland law, “it is not a crime for an adult to have consensual sexual relations with a female who is 16 years of age or older… Defendants did not communicate this information when they defamed through the YouTube video at issue, because they wanted viewers of the video to think that was in fact a pedophile and a predator—which is not true.”