by Trump’s attorneys that alleges the prosecutors are overreaching and acting in “bad faith” in their attempts to subpoena Trump’s personal and corporate tax documents.
Vance’s office calls the lawsuit “baseless” and casts it as an attempt to “delay the grand jury’s investigation.” The filing notes the lawsuit’s claim that the subpoena is overbroad “rests on the false premise that the grand jury’s investigation is limited to so-called ‘hush-money’ payments made by Michael Cohen on behalf of Plaintiff in 2016.”
While the filing claims that Vance’s office “bears no affirmative burden to justify the breadth of the Mazars Subpoena,” it nonetheless points to public reporting that it says “establishes a satisfactory predicate for the Mazars Subpoena.”written by David Fahrenthold in March 2019 detailing how Trump reportedly sent “deeply flawed” documents over-inflating his net worth to apply for loans and insurance premium reductions, make business deals and boast to journalists.
“As this reporting makes clear, at the time the Mazars Subpoena was issued, there were public allegations of possible criminal activity at Plaintiff’s New York County-based Trump Organization dating back over a decade,” the filing states.Trump’s accounting firm Mazars USA in August 2019 for Trump’s tax returns. The probe was initially believed to focus on “hush-money” payments made by Trump fixer Michael Cohen to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.
It's always from NY, from the Governor to the courts all corrupt.
Bull shit!!
How about talking about the children Vote realDonaldTrump !!!
🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Normally, an investigation would matter. But when it's just a continuation of the vendetta against Trump, it's just more nonsense.
Oh, Forbes! Who is the hidden boss?
We don’t believe any of this bs anymore idiots!! 30mill on the fraud MuellerReport is the reason none of this holds any water
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Source: RollingStone - 🏆 483. / 51 Read more »
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Source: papermagazine - 🏆 409. / 53 Read more »