London, Feb 2019: EasyJet aircraft on the hardpan having luggage loaded via a conveyor belt at Gatwick Airport London.London's Gatwick Airport said it is experimenting with new methods of plane boarding in a bid to quicken the procedure and prevent passengers from scrambling forward at the gate.
In one reported example, 158 passengers were boarded within 14 minutes. In its statement, Gatwick said it hopes to consistently reduce boarding times by up to 10%, compared with conventional methods. The experiment is being conducted in alliance with the U.K. budget carrier easyJet at Gate 101 in the airport's North Terminal.Abhi Chacko, head of enabling technologies and digital innovation at Gatwick Airport, said in a statement Wednesday that the aim is to find out if boarding by seat number will avoid queues at the gate and as passengers step on to the plane.
The method currently used to board is daft and one could hardly have devised a system so messed up that is certain to create delay and frustration.
How about the ingenious idea of loading from back to the front instead of the shitshow at Southwest or ludicrous ideas of grouping. First class could be last on and first idea; the least time on the flying sardine can; how tragic could that be?
Already been done.
SouthwestAir has this figured out.
The only reason anyone wants to get on the plane early is to secure a spot for their rollerboard. If there were ample designated room for everyone's carry-ons, there would be no crowding at the gate. More people would probably wait until the last possible second to board.
BreakingNews This UK airport is testing new boarding methods to find the most efficient ways to get passengers onto planes. find/found/found get/got/got or gotten They're everywhere and the book is yours!😀😀😀 esl ingles english books kindle news
Nothing new! Could be for that (UK) world.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »
Source: voguemagazine - 🏆 715. / 51 Read more »
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »