Latino groups sue over Texas redistricting

  • 📰 NBCNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 37 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 86%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The lawsuit was filed as the Texas Legislature was nearing completion of U.S. House maps that shore up Republicans and do not add additional Latino majority districts, even though Latinos account for more than half of the state’s growth.

The Voting Rights Act protects minority voters' right to choose who represents them, whether or not that is a person of color.

In its 2013 Shelby v Holder decision, the Supreme Court essentially gutted the Voting Rights Act by nullifying Section 5 protections from discrimination. The 2020 census showed that Texas’ population grew by nearly 4 million people, making it the only state to add two congressional seats because of population growth.

The lawsuit also argues that the 2020 census shows that court-ordered maps that were used in the 2020 general election “do not reflect the population shifts that occurred within the last decade and are unconstitutionally malapportioned.” MALDEF filed the lawsuit Monday even as it is resolving payment of attorneys’ fees form a decade-old suit it filed against Texas over its last round of redistricting.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

It’s called fighting voter fraud.

Illegals can't vote unless democrats pass their freedom to vote act. It pretty much allows anyone to vote and they prohibit any verification process with 80% of registered voters believing there's nothing wrong with IDs.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 10. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Gun Group Worries That Texas Abortion Bounty System Will Be Used Against ThemThey're asking the Supreme Court to strike down the law that allows private citizens to sue each other. Imagine that, someone actually looking at how this would play out down the road... You mean actions have consequences? They should have had that energy before the legislation passed, lmao!
Source: Jezebel - 🏆 153. / 63 Read more »

Sonia Sotomayor Issues Scathing Dissent After Supreme Court Refuses to Block Texas Abortion Ban“Every day the Court fails to grant relief is devastating, both for individual women and for our constitutional system as a whole,” the justice wrote. The court will hold oral arguments… 'A total shock. Certainly something we didn't expect from the always unpredictable Sotomayor.' Said no one, anywhere.
Source: RollingStone - 🏆 483. / 51 Read more »

Supreme Court Refuses to Block Texas Abortion Ban, Agrees to Hear Two Cases Challenging the LawOn Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear two cases challenging a Texas law banning abortion after six weeks, but refused to block the law while it considers the case—leaving Texans without access to safe, legal abortion health care. The Court set oral arguments for the cases on November 1.'For the second time, the Court declines to act immediately to protect these women from grave and irreparable harm,' Justice Sotomayor wrote a searing dissent to the Court’s refusal to enjoin the law.
Source: MsMagazine - 🏆 378. / 59 Read more »

Texas police officer fired after fatal shooting of man following low-speed chase'They are handing down judgements without giving time for a complete investigation,' said the Arlington Police Association. Which is code for 'you didn't give us enough time to cover it up!' I mean really.... just fired?! The guy just killed a man. Kneel now!~! America. Texas: Police: executing: for MovingViolations. Maddow Lawrence.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court takes up challenge to Texas abortion banThe U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear on Nov. 1 a challenge to a Texas law that imposes a near-total ban on the procedure and lets private citizens enforce it - a case that could dramatically curtail abortion access in the United States if the justices endorse the measure's unique design. another propaganda line out of the leftist narrative. If these strong and independent women controlled their own bodies this wouldn't be an issue. That republican club of the six justices needs or want to do a redo, they did not envision the push back from the nation, the days are gone when you think you can take a woman’s right away and they sit back and say , more can I have more, please!!
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »