Key moments in the U.S. Supreme Court's latest abortion case that could change how women get care

Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.bans that have been enacted since the court upended the Roe v. Wade constitutional right to abortion. While the current case involves an Idaho abortion ban, the court’s ruling could have implications beyond that state.

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the Biden administration, cautioned that other states could pass laws limiting how emergency rooms offer other services, which could mean trouble for more patients when they go to a hospital. Barrett, one of the conservatives who voted to overturn Roe v. Wade, pressed Turner on when a prosecutor might bring charges against a doctor for providing an abortion. Experts whom Turner had cited, Barrett said, had told the court that doctors who performed abortions in those cases would be protected.

“Does health mean only physical health or does it also mean mental health?” Alito asked Prelogar, noting that he was trying to get her on the record about it if future incidents arise. “The text of the statute which says in no uncertain terms, here is the fundamental guarantee: If you have an emergency medical condition and you go to an ER in this country, they have to stabilize you,” Prelogar said.

That means at least five members of the court voted to put on hold a lower court’s ruling that the federal law overrides Idaho’s abortion ban in medical emergencies. So the Biden administration was facing a tough road in persuading the court to uphold that ruling.

Sonia Sotomayor Health Amy Coney Barrett

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court gives skeptical eye to key statute used to prosecute Jan. 6 riotersConservatives on the court expressed varying degrees of skepticism about the charge of obstructing an official proceeding.
Source: KPBSnews - 🏆 240. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court gives skeptical eye to key statute used to prosecute Jan. 6 riotersConservatives on the court expressed varying degrees of skepticism about the charge of obstructing an official proceeding.
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

Highlights from Supreme Court arguments over key charge for Jan. 6 riotersThe Supreme Court heard arguments over a law used to charge hundreds of Jan. 6 rioters and leveled against Donald Trump in his federal election obstruction case.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Supreme Court divided over key charge against Jan. 6 rioters and TrumpConservatives including Justices Neil M. Gorsuch and Samuel A. Alito Jr. expressed concern about giving prosecutors too much power.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

A key Supreme Court bribery case could come down to the definition of one wordJessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School, is the host of the 'Passing Judgment' podcast. She is also the director of the Public Service Institute at Loyola Law School, director of Loyola's Journalist Law School and former president of the Los Angeles Ethics Commission.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Some Jan. 6 rioters win early release, even before key Supreme Court rulingThe high court’s pending review of a key federal charge levied against Jan. 6 defendants - and Donald Trump - is triggering early releases of some high-profile defendants.
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »