Justice Dept. meets Trump, Giuliani vote-fraud claims with silent skepticism

Justice Dept. meets Trump, Giuliani vote-fraud claims with silent skepticism

11/21/2020 9:02:00 PM

Justice Dept. meets Trump, Giuliani vote-fraud claims with silent skepticism

Federal law enforcement officials have not embraced the Trump campaign’s conjecture about vote tampering.

November 21, 2020 at 12:17 PM ESTThe Justice Department has met President Trump’s fantastical claims of widespread voter fraud with two weeks of skeptical silence, not taking any overt moves to investigate what Trump’s lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, claims is a globe-spanning conspiracy to steal the election.

Elton John honors Anthony Fauci on World AIDS Day Key lines from the unveiling of Biden's new economic team A Colorado photographer said he watched the now-famous monolith in southeast Utah fall to the ground

arrow-rightSuch deafening silence from one of the government’s main enforcers of election law indicates just how little evidence there is to support the wild, wide-ranging claims made by Trump and his supporters, most notably Giuliani in a Thursday news conference held inside the Republican National Committee headquarters.

Privately, Justice Department officials have said they are willing to investigate legitimate claims of vote fraud; Attorney General William P. Barr even loosened some restrictions that might otherwise have discouraged prosecutors from doing so before results are certified.

As defeats pile up, Trump tries to delay vote countBut current and former officials said they thought Giuliani’s accusations sounded “crazy,” and they have not seen or heard of any evidence suggesting large-scale fraud, let alone the kind of intercontinental conspiracy described by the president’s lawyer. Like others, they spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a politically sensitive matter.

ADADA Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment.The Justice Department’s silence is “a tiny sliver of normalcy, and frankly a positive sign that we are on our way back to a better place,” said Justin Levitt, a former Justice Department voting rights official in the Obama administration who is now a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles.

“In a way, that’s hard to say because it feels like lowering the bar to below the floor, to say we should all be pretty pleased that the institution of law enforcement for the United States didn’t go either full-on partisan talking-point machine or full-on conspiracy theorist. In normal times, that wouldn’t be something to celebrate, that would just be a given. . . . The Justice Department also hasn’t come out and said the world is round, because they don’t need to.”

ADADLevitt noted that the public can have an inflated sense of the federal government’s role in elections, when much of the law and regulations are handled at the state and local levels.“The Justice Department is a very powerful battleship, but there are limits to its jurisdiction, and in an awful lot of elections, the contested ground is on land or in the air, where a battleship doesn’t do you a lot of good,” Levitt said.

China has promised millions of coronavirus vaccines to countries around the world. And it is ready to deliver them Unsealed court ruling discloses bribe-for-pardon probe related to Trump White House K-pop group BTS can defer military service after South Korea passes new law

Federal law enforcement officials have also said they want to avoid getting dragged into investigations that lack any reasonable basis of suspicion. In many of the affidavits cited by Giuliani and other Republicans, the assertions amount to ill-defined suspicions and conjecture about what might have happened, not witness accounts of actual misconduct.

ADIn a handful of instances, the Justice Department has quietly signaled it is reviewing allegations that have been brought to the department, but even in those instances, federal officials have found little evidence of wrongdoing, people familiar with the matter say.

ADOne Justice Department official said that just the act of announcing a probe might cast an unwarranted “pall” on the election’s credibility.Richard L. Hasen, a law professor at the University of California at Irvine and the author of “Election Meltdown

,” said that given the attorney general’s public disparagement of mail-in voting leading up to the election, “if there had been anything he could have hung his hat on after the election, he would have done so. The fact that no one has come forward with anything as far as we know, that’s a pretty good indication this has been a pretty clean election.”

Read more: The Washington Post »

Watch Barack Obama surprise a super-fan - CNN Video

Former President Barack Obama was a guest on 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' and agreed to get in on a planned stunt with one of his fans.

Yeah that’s why you got 300 likes here lmao you just killed your paper hahaha 😂 we done with al of you enjoy your 300 followers LOL