claimed he only entered the Capitol to retrieve a fellow officer. A lawyer for a Texas man who confronted Capitol police accused prosecutors of rushing to judgment against somebody prone to exaggerating.
A wealth of video evidence and self-incriminating behavior by riot defendants has given prosecutors the upper hand in many cases. Mary McCord, a Georgetown University Law Center professor and former Justice Department official, said jurors often won't have to rely on witness testimony or circumstantial evidence because videos captured much of the violence and destruction on Jan. 6.
Stephen Saltzburg, a George Washington Law School professor and former Justice Department official, said it may be difficult for prosecutors to secure convictions against defendants who merely entered the Capitol and didn’t exhibit any violent or destructive behavior. The unnamed Metropolitan Police Department officer described the encounter in a written statement. The officer said Webster swung the flagpole at him in a downward chopping motion, hitting a metal barricade, then charged at him with clenched fists.
Mehta, however, said the video doesn't show Webster getting punched in the face. The judge described Webster as an instigator."It was his conduct that sort of broke the dam, at least in that area," Mehta added.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ComicBook - 🏆 65. / 68 Read more »
Source: epicurious - 🏆 114. / 63 Read more »
Source: HoustonChron - 🏆 609. / 51 Read more »
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Source: nbcchicago - 🏆 545. / 51 Read more »
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »