Jim Jordan tears into credibility of Supreme Court Alito whistleblower in explosive hearing

Rep. Jim Jordan , the House Judiciary Committee's ranking Republican, tore into a former anti-abortion leader who alleged he was informed in advance about the outcome of a 2014 Supreme Court ruling Thursday, casting serious doubt on the whistleblower's allegations that the information came from Justice Samuel Alito.

But rather than focusing on Schenck's allegations about the 2014 opinion, the Ohio Republican ultimately convinced Schenck to admit that some details from a book he wrote in 2018 about the high court were inaccurate. "It had been a minor victory when we persuaded the court that 'reverend' should remain before Paul's name, even though we had been told repeatedly that legal briefs never included such titles," Jordan read from Schenck's book.

"You said you winked because they included 'reverend' in the title, and the transcript says Mr. Rehnquist didn't," Jordan added."One thing I've learned: People who mislead folks on small things mislead them on big things," Jordan said later during the interrogation. Last month, the New York Times published Schenck's account. Politico later reported the outlet spent several months attempting to corroborate his claims and was"unable to locate anyone who heard about the decision directly from either Alito or his wife before its release at the end of June 2014."

Jim_Jordan Go far away cooch

Jim_Jordan You mean Gym Jordan the enabler of sexual predators?

Jim_Jordan Jim_Jordan doesn't have any credibility here! Republican weaponized incompetence to go along with a dude who is a taxpayer funded social media influencer! Pardons Gymmy! What about it?

Jim_Jordan The moral degenerate who couldn’t pass the bar exam has no idea how the law works.

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

At hearing, Jim Jordan ensnares Democrats’ witness who accused Justice Alito of leaking 2014 rulingThe top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee proved Democrats’ star witness at a Thursday hearing about the Supreme Court had been dishonest, possibly lying, about a specific claim he had made in an earlier book.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Americans must rely on Supreme Court to save traditional views on marriageAmericans must rely on the Supreme Court to save traditional views on marriage. Congress’s new Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t respect people of faith. Marriage was man-made! Denying basic rights to people (gay people) does not make you more free. It has the opposite effect.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

What each Supreme Court Justice has said about gay marriageWhile the Supreme Court discusses 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, Newsweek looks at how each judge stands on same-sex marriage. Read Leviticus 20:13 and get some morals.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Oregon Supreme Court leaves in place order blocking strict new gun lawThe Oregon Supreme Court ruled to keep in place a lower court ruling that blocked a strict new gun law that voters approved by passing a measure on November's ballot. I was just in Portland, and I can't believe the people continue to vote the way they do. It once was a beautiful city, but the number of people living in the streets and the crime, trash, and unsanitary conditions that comes with it is just sad. You should carry protection there.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

AP WAS THERE: Supreme Court legalizes interracial marriageWith the passage of the the Respect for Marriage Act, which protects same-sex and interracial marriages, The Associated Press is republishing its 1967 story by reporter Karl R
Source: WOKVNews - 🏆 247. / 63 Read more »