In 'Very Big Deal for the Survival of Our Democracy,' SCOTUS Rejects Fringe Legal Theory

the U.S. Constitution only empowers state legislatures to regulate federal elections, without checks from state constitutions, courts, or governors.

"When a state legislature carries out its federal constitutional power to prescribe rules regulating federal elections, it acts both as a lawmaking body created and bound by its state constitution, and as the entity assigned particular authority by the federal Constitution," he continued. "Both constitutions restrain the state legislature's exercise of power."

Both the majority opinion and campaigners pointed to precedent. Fair Elections Center litigation director Jon Sherman said that "for 233 years and counting, no court has ever found that state election laws are unconstrained by state constitutional requirements, because this is a fantasy that is antithetical to our system of government."plaintiffs, called the 6-3 decision "a resounding victory for free and fair elections in the United States.

The case was argued in the wake of former President Donald Trump—who is seeking the Republican nomination for 2024—and his supporters refusing the accept the results of the 2020 election, which led to the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. Notably, two of the three Trump-appointed justices, Barrett and Kavanaugh, rejected the ISLT.

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

The Supreme Court’s Indian Child Welfare Decision Neglected One Big ThingWhat Gorsuch’s opinion doesn’t acknowledge is that for many Black families, families of color, and poor families, the disaster continues today.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

There’s a Time Bomb in Progressives’ Big Supreme Court Voting Case WinThe decision gave voters a win today, but it sets up a Supreme Court power grab down the line. rickhasen breaks down the court's ruling in Moore v. Harper. rickhasen Get the latest from Slate's legal team in your inbox tonight and whenever big rulings drop—sign up for our Opinionpalooza newsletter (it's free!).
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

'Really Big': US Supreme Court Ruling Against Norfolk Southern Seen as Rebuke to Corporate ImpunityBig business lawyers are 'going to be furious with this decision,' said one legal expert.
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

The Supreme Court Just Dropped a Big L on Partisan GerrymanderingSurprise! The conservative-leaning Court squashed “independent state legislature theory,” saying state courts have the authority to rule on election shenanigans.
Source: thedailybeast - 🏆 307. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court news: Why 6-3 conservative court has Obama, Schumer, and Pelosi cheeringDemocrats are cheering for the conservative majority Supreme Court after a Tuesday ruling in Moore v. Harper, saying the rejection of the so-called independent state legislature theory marked a win for voting rights.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Summit County judge achieves re-certification from Ohio Supreme Court for Valor Court ProgramPresiding Judge Susan Baker Ross earned a final certificate from the Ohio Supreme Court's Commission on Specialized Dockets for the Valor Court.
Source: WEWS - 🏆 323. / 59 Read more »