However, despite these positive steps, there are potential pitfalls — especially if the law is not implemented in a way that is survivor-centered.
If an applicant already provided testimony to a government agency, this would be considered strong evidence, and their case would be approvable without a committee interview. This would benefit most Yazidi survivors who returned from captivity and provided statements to NGOs and government agencies. The rationale was that these traumatized individuals had little incentive to provide detailed statements; in fact, a number of survivors informed me that they gave statements under coercion.
One major drawback is that Article 10 only requires that 30 percent of the committee be women. Although this was a floor and not a ceiling, it appears that the committee will be dominated by men. This places a significant burden on female committee members to interview female survivors, who would be reticent to speak about their captivity in front of men.
The Directorate intends to take responsibility for gathering evidence of statements that survivors gave to government agencies and NGOs, rather than having applicants travel to these offices at their own expense. This is unprecedented in Iraq and, if handled efficiently and confidentially, offers an important way in which this reparations program can be survivor centered.
Confidentiality is key because applicants are expected when they apply to provide sensitive information about crimes they were exposed to — details that could lead to
WomenUndrSiege Plz watch and subscribe A perfect channel for kids. animation kids child cartoons childrensbooks
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: womensmediacntr - 🏆 397. / 53 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: AKpublicnews - 🏆 387. / 55 Read more »
Source: nbcbayarea - 🏆 596. / 51 Read more »
Source: KTVU - 🏆 465. / 53 Read more »