foreign policy record. The judge said that mentioning Trump was"inappropriate." I was baffled. I had planned to argue that Biden’s foreign policy had fallen short in comparison to the previous administration — a perfectly valid approach, yet one I was not allowed to use, according to the judge. Put simply, I had to conform to her ideology if I wanted a chance to win.
Another topic:"A Resolution to Oppose Oppressive Voter ID Laws." Why is the word"oppressive" in what is supposed to be a neutral, two-sided topic? We should absolutely have a debate on voter ID, but not one that is tilted in favor of one side and deems voter ID laws as"oppressive" right out of the gate. If one side wants to argue that, fine by me, but the topic shouldn’t try to rig the debate before it starts.
Even if I get a fair judge in high school debate, I’m stuck with peers who decry mainstream ideas, words, and actions as"toxic." If I say that sex is binary, I’m"transphobic." If I say that COVID-19 originated in China, I’m a"racist." If I say that I’m proud to be an American, I’m a"nationalist."
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Source: VanityFair - 🏆 391. / 55 Read more »
Source: PennLive - 🏆 463. / 53 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Source: ChicagoBreaking - 🏆 521. / 51 Read more »
Source: BreitbartNews - 🏆 610. / 51 Read more »