“I Cannot Think of Many Things More Frightening”: The Supreme Court Has Declared War on Governing

  • 📰 VanityFair
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 51 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 24%
  • Publisher: 55%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Narrowing the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority speaks to the Supreme Court's larger, scarier, project to dismantle the administrative state. Read the latest from cristianafarias:

joined by Sotomayor and Breyer, put the court’s overstep in its proper light. “The Court today issues what is really an advisory opinion on the proper scope of the new rule EPA is considering,” she wrote. “That new rule will be subject anyway to immediate, pre-enforcement judicial review. But this Court could not wait—even to see what the new rule says—to constrain EPA’s efforts to address climate change.

In the law, at least before this case, an advisory opinion is presumptively unconstitutional because federal judges, including Roberts and his comrades, may only entertain “cases” or “controversies.” That’s bad enough. Even Roberts, in his own majority opinion, takes notice that Kagan is accusing him of “champing at the bit.” But the bigger sin ofis that the Supreme Court isn’t just hobbling an agency, an administration, or even a president wishing to respond to a pressing issue of national importance.

Congress, after all, told regulators to choose the “best system of emission reduction.” And if that doesn’t mean power plants that don’t contaminate the planet, then what does? As Kagan writes, “The ‘best system’ full stop—no ifs, ands, or buts of any kind relevant here.” She rightly focuses her darts on the Roberts court, as well as Justice, to note that its larger agenda is to dismantle the administrative state. “Today, one of those broader goals makes itself clear,” she writes.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Photos of clean steam stacks do not scare me. Sorry.

Ridiculous statement...

cristianafarias Their logic behind this is very scary. We should not be complacent.

cristianafarias Co2 is not pollution!! Pictures of clean steam stacks is just propaganda.

cristianafarias Wasn't the EPA created by President Nixon?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 391. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Markey, Bowman Join Climate Coalition in Urging SCOTUS Expansion\u0022We cannot sit idly by,\u0022 said Markey, \u0022as extremists on the Supreme Court eviscerate the authorities that the government has had for decades to combat climate change and reduce pollution.\u0022 SenMarkey What's the plan SenMarkey SenSchumer ?
Source: commondreams - 🏆 530. / 51 Read more »

SCOTUS limits EPA’s ability to regulate emissions in ‘stunning reversal of environmental laws’The U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has ruled on a 6-3 margin that Congress did not authorize the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate coal and natural gas plants. A while ago the SCOTUS made a statement about doing work for Lawmakers inaction. This ruling and the abortion case have been sent to the Lawmakers to get to work. I hope this forces all lawmakers do actually do something. Good thing its up to Congress now to 'craft policy' that the EPA can then enforce.
Source: Mynorthwest - 🏆 438. / 53 Read more »

AOC slams Supreme Court for ‘religious bias’ towards ChristiansRep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez accused the Supreme Court of having a bias toward Christianity, after it recently sided with a high school football coach who prayed on the 50-yard line. She's going to age terribly. Will look like a man in 10 years. Ask hillary As long as they're not Christian, right? A Muslim prayer would have been perfectly fine, I suppose.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

How today's Supreme Court decision could change things at the borderIn a 5-4 ruling, justices found that immigration law gives the Biden administration discretion to end the 'Remain in Mexico' policy, which forced some migrants to wait in Mexico while their immigration cases were pending If you thought immigration was bad before, just wait and see what happens now Go ahead Biden, that RedWave is only getting bigger and bigger.
Source: cnni - 🏆 326. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court rules Biden can end Trump's 'Remain in Mexico' policyThe Supreme Court upholds Biden's broad power to repeal the Trump-era 'Remain in Mexico' policy. Great... So all these tents will cross over and setup on this side of the border.. One more nail in the democrats coffin at this year's mid-terms...
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Sworn In to Supreme CourtJustice Ketanji Brown Jackson has been sworn in to the Supreme Court. America Newest L I hope she’s smarter than the rest of them. I hope she remembers that there’s a separation from church and state for a reason. Such as the cult of christianity!
Source: TMZ - 🏆 379. / 59 Read more »