How Biden may save U.S. gas exports to Europe

Cleaning up fuel producers' climate pollution at home could help the industry avoid 'a trans-Atlantic green gas war.'

11/27/2020 3:06:00 PM

President-elect Joe Biden's plan to crack down on the energy industry's greenhouse gas pollution could offer a boon for U.S. natural gas producers who want to keep exporting to an increasingly climate-minded Europe

Cleaning up fuel producers' climate pollution at home could help the industry avoid 'a trans-Atlantic green gas war.'

Flared natural gas is burned off Feb. 5, 2015 at the Deadwood natural gas plant in Garden City, Texas. | Spencer Platt/Getty ImagesBy11/27/2020 04:30 AM ESTLink CopiedPresident-elect Joe Biden's plan to crack down on the energy industry's greenhouse gas pollution could offer a boon for U.S. natural gas producers who want to keep exporting to an increasingly climate-minded Europe.

AOC: There are ‘legitimate white supremacist sympathizers’ at core of House GOP Biden to sign executive orders expanding access, strengthening ObamaCare through special enrollment period Virginia parent boils over in frustration against school shutdown: video

U.S. gas shipments to Europe have soared since 2016, driven by the American fracking boom and efforts to help the Continent lessen its reliance on Russia. But pressure on European countries to reduce their impact on the climate is threatening to close off opportunities for the U.S. because of the heavy amounts of planet-warming methane released when the gas is produced.

Now, Biden's promise to reduce those methane emissions could make U.S. gas shipments more palatable to Europe.Such an outcome would contradict one of President Donald Trump's closing campaign themes: that electing the former vice president would spell doom for U.S. fossil fuel producers. But it could rankle progressive climate activists who are pushing for Biden to end fracking and stop all U.S. fossil fuel exports.

The Trump administration rolled back Obama-era methane regulations for new oil and gas wells in August, and last month, a federal judge in Wyoming struck down a 2016 rule designed to rein in methane emissions from oil and gas production on public lands. While natural gas emits half as much carbon dioxide as coal when burned, methane also leaks from wells and the equipment used to transport it, offsetting the fuel’s climate advantages over coal.

European Union countries took delivery of 36 percent of overall U.S. liquefied natural gas cargoes in 2019, but buyers there are taking a closer look at how the industry addresses those leaks. France and Ireland have both taken recent steps to limit imports of U.S. natural gas.

European governments are souring on the business-as-usual approach of many gas producers in West Texas and New Mexico, said Jason Bordoff, director of the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University and a former climate adviser in the Obama White House.

“There’s growing pressure in the European Union that if they’re going to go with gas, they have to hold it to a higher standard and not go with the lowest common denominator,” Bordoff said.Biden has pledged to take action as soon as he takes office to combat climate change, including setting aggressive methane pollution limits for new and existing oil and gas operations. He's likely to rely initially on executive actions to send clear signals to governments around the globe that the U.S. is serious about tackling methane emissions even if Congress takes longer to move, Bordoff and other energy experts said.

GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene faces a backlash over incendiary social media posts Delays in covid-19 vaccine delivery are causing tempers to flare and timetables to slip Kinzinger voted to impeach 'knowing ... it could very well be terminal to my career'

Biden could sign an executive order instructing the Environmental Protection Agency to reinstate the emissions standards the Trump administration removed for new sources of pollution and apply them to existing ones. Biden’s Justice Department is also likely to stop defending the lawsuits that environmental groups brought against the Trump administration's methane rules.

Some Eastern European countries such as Poland continue to welcome imports of U.S. gas as a way to displace coal. And sales to Asia continue, although countries there are also becoming more sensitive to methane emissions.But a wider European pushback against U.S. natural gas is real, multiple people at the gas companies have said. To the energy industry people, the best way for Biden to tackle the problem is to negotiate a shared standard for countries to measure the carbon content of natural gas, while making methane regulations a top policy priority at home.

“There’s a real sensitivity in the EU about fracked gas,” said one U.S. industry executive who asked for anonymity to discuss business discussions. The incoming administration “would be well advised to prioritize that. If [customers] can’t use U.S. gas, then they’re using Russian gas and Mideast gas.”

That wariness around buying U.S. natural gas is relatively new. After the Obama administration started approving export permits in 2015, countries across Europe generally welcomed the U.S. shipments as an alternative to their traditional suppliers in Russia or the Middle East.

But the controversy surrounding Texas oil companies’ practice of venting — simply releasing unwanted methane into the air — or burning it off through flaring has become a major issue for some European countries intent on fighting climate change. Texas companies have flared 1 trillion cubic feet of methane into the atmosphere since 2013, according to an estimate by the Environmental Defense Fund, an environmental group that has worked with oil companies to try to reduce emissions. A recent report from the group showed EPA was probably undercounting methane emissions by 60 percent.

Engie, a major French trading house, walked away from a proposed $7 billion, 20-year deal to import natural gas from NextDecade, a Texas liquefied natural gas company. A copy of Engie’s analysis of the proposed deal, obtained by French environmental group Les Amis de la Terre and shared with POLITICO, shows that the company feared financial repercussions if it contracted to buy the Texas shale gas that NextDecade had been offering.

Video: Jan. 28, 1986: Space Shuttle Challenger Explosion Dem rep plans to introduce a resolution to expel Marjorie Taylor Greene EXPLAINER: How experts will hunt for COVID origins in China

The analysis warned that Engie, which is partly owned by the French government, could see its reputation suffer among the European public and investors concerned with environmental, social and governance issues.“Gas flaring has become a major source of negative attention for gas production globally and for Permian oil producers in particular,” Engie wrote in the document.

“As the Project will result in a long-term commitment to secure LNG supply associated to shale exploitation, and to import all or part of it into Europe, they may question the compatibility with ENGIE’S Raison d’Etre, causing reputational damage, which should be factored in the final decision,” the analysis continued. “We cannot exclude that two topics might impact our ESG rating: negative environmental impact and controversies (if any) linked to the project.”

An Engie spokesperson confirmed the document's authenticity.In Ireland, the coalition government recently came out against importing natural gas from the United States. A joint policy statement released by the country’s three largest political parties in June withdrew support for a planned expansion of the Shannon LNG import terminal that was backed by U.S. company New Fortress Energy.

“As Ireland moves towards carbon neutrality, we do not believe that it makes sense to develop LNG gas import terminals importing fracked gas, accordingly we shall withdraw the Shannon LNG terminal from the EU Projects of Common Interest list in 2021,” the coalition government said in its Programme for Government.

Germany is also showing signs of reconsidering increased gas imports from the U.S., amid anger over the Trump administration’s pressure for the country to halt the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia. German trading firm Uniper earlier this month backed away from plans to build a new gas import terminal, blaming lack of interest from potential buyers.

But while the Biden administration could use executive actions to crack down on methane pollution on federal land, reducing emissions from the private land in West Texas where most production occurs will be more difficult.The three members of the Texas Railroad Commission, the state agency that regulates the oil and gas industry there, include Wayne Christian, who has questioned the scientific consensus that human activity causes climate change. Incoming Commissioner Jim Wright has said methane doesn’t contribute to climate change, even though scientists have long known that methane is a far more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide despite staying in the atmosphere for a shorter period.

Christian said the commission “takes flaring seriously” and has already taken steps to reduce emissions with new regulations it is adopting. Moves by investors to back away from buying U.S. natural gas would not help reduce flaring, Christian added in a statement to POLITICO.

Read more: POLITICO »

Amanda Gorman calls on Americans to 'leave behind a country better than the one we were left' in powerful inauguration poem

Amanda Gorman, the nation's first-ever youth poet laureate, called for Americans Wednesday to 'leave behind a country better than the one we were left' and unify together as she spoke at President Joe Biden's inauguration.

Probably too expensive Nothing new. You misspelled former Vice President Joe Biden, again... Or, how about we use solar power and stop this oil and gas addiction commonsense education JoeBiden KamalaHarris JonathanScott And so the Wars in the Middle-East will escalate......🤦 Boring now. Biden won. End of. How about something else? Fact 1 = Biden supported the UK in 1982 against Argentina, when Dublin did not Fact 2 = ‘82 was not the first time the USA was involved in a Falklands dispute Lexington Raid 1831 anyone?

AKA the free market. Joe Biden is NOT President elect!!! This is propaganda PUTIN AND TRUMP are building a tunnel to Alaska . A $ 65 BILLION DOLLAR TUNNEL for their oil , natural gas and electricity ! Taking tens of thousands of jobs away from here in America using clean climate friendly energy programs ! GREEEDY TRAITOR

Biden won't be saving anything. Because Biden didn't win ✌ And there go American jobs Gas production leaks methane which is a massive greenhouse gas contributor. These are bullshit talking points from an industry so embedded in political grift that nobody is calling them out. Gas was an answer in 1988 when the denial started in earnest. Planet is past that.

He'll be riding realDonaldTrump coat tail on this one. realDonaldTrump made our energy boom. EnemyOfThePeople There is no such thing as 'green gas' President-Elect! 🤣 A new Direction in energy is going to bring a landslide of financial rewards as well as global benefits to this planet that haven't been seen before. The US has to move into the 21st century we are falling behind, living like we did in the Industrial Age a century ago.

“Save”? Trump increased gas exports A LOT. during his term. The question is if Biden can keep it 🤷🏽‍♂️ Dead shale oil that has destroyed the US nature .. Good