How a Texas man is testing out-of-state abortions by asking a court to subpoena his ex-partner

  • 📰 wfaa
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 60 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 27%
  • Publisher: 51%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Texas Supreme Court Justices are considering whether to hear an appeal that could have far-reaching consequences.

Both sides agree the Texas case could test the meaning of “leave it to the states,” which has become the law of the land for abortion in the U.S.AUSTIN, Texas — A Texas man is petitioning a court to authorize an obscure legal action to find out who allegedly helped his former partner obtain an out-of-state abortion, setting up the latest test of the reach of statewide abortion bans.antiabortion activists have begun testing the boundaries of statewide bans in court.

The Texas abortion ban provides for enforcement either through a private civil action or under the state's criminal statutes, which were updated to prohibit nearly all abortions, punishable by up to life in prison for anyone held responsible for helping a woman obtain one. “Being involved in or helping someone get a legal abortion outside of Texas is legal,” said Hearron. “There is nothing wrong with it.”“The limit on the ability to travel is a step beyond what I think we have seen anywhere,” said Michelle Simpson Tuegel, an attorney who specializes in women’s rights cases. “I pray we are not living in times where our high courts are going to say that our home states can trap us when we are pregnant.”Since the U.S.

Idaho adopted a ban on what it calls “abortion trafficking,” aimed at preventing transporting minors out of state for an abortion without parental permission, butAfter Alabama's attorney general said his office would “look at” groups that help women get abortions, the U.S. Department of Justice, an abortion fund and former providers asked a court to block such investigations. On Monday, a federal judge said most of their lawsuit can move ahead.

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 543. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Both sides claim victory after Supreme Court rules Texas rancher can sue state over flooded landsThe Supreme Court ruled that ranchers and other property owners can move forward with a Fifth Amendment lawsuit claiming Texas highway construction flooded their lands.
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

Supreme Court sides with veteran and Texas landowner in separate rulingsThe Supreme Court released rulings in two cases for a veteran seeking educational benefits and a Texas landowner in a takings dispute.
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »

Supreme Court: Landowner can sue Texas for flood damagesRichie DeVillier, who owns land east of Houston, said the state owes him damages for constant flooding after Texas made changes to Interstate 10 near his property.
Source: TexasTribune - 🏆 441. / 53 Read more »

Supreme Court rules landowners can sue Texas over highway expansion that flooded, damaged propertyThe Supreme Court Tuesday ruled in favor of a Texas rancher and other landowners who say the state flooded their properties, allowing them to sue the state for compensation for their damaged buildings, animals and crops.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Texas protest organizers could see more lawsuits against them after U.S. Supreme Court decisionThe high court declined to hear a Louisiana case involving a police officer who was injured during a 2016 protest and sued its organizer.
Source: KUT - 🏆 77. / 68 Read more »

Protesting got way harder in Texas because of a U.S. Supreme Court decisionDue to the action — or, more accurately, the inaction — of the U.S. Supreme Court, organizers of mass protests in Texas and two other states now could be on the hook financially for any criminal act committed by an attendee. On Monday, the high court opted not to hear the case of Mckesson v.
Source: SAcurrent - 🏆 607. / 51 Read more »