Halle Berry is issuing an apology after revealing in a recent interview she considered playing a transgender man."As a cisgender woman, I now understand that I should not have considered this role, and that the transgender community should undeniably have the opportunity to tell their own stories," she wrote.
When Brown asked Berry if she would ever cut her hair short again, the actress said that she would. Berry then brought up that she was considering a role as a transgender man, which would require her to cut her hair short. Related video: Halle Berry wants to ‘kick ageism in the face’"I want to experience that world," Berry said of the transgender role."This world, who this woman was, is so interesting to me. And that will probably be my next acting role."
"The language here demonstrates @halleberry doesn’t even know what a trans man IS," wrote @prestonmaxallen. "This is why cis people can’t take trans roles - too many confuse our actual identities with their Oscar bait. I look forward to her apology and dropping of this part.""Thank you for listening and learning and providing opportunities for trans folks to have this role," tweeted activist April Reign.
You know, Tom Hanks has never been in the military. He should leave those roles to actors who have served... Also, he's never been a lawyer either. We need to leave those roles to former lawyers who are now actors.
TheOneRebel Meanwhile, Daniel Radcliffe apologizes for playing a wizard in the Harry Potter movies since the role should have been given to a real wizard boy..
eeee CharlizeAfrica played a gay in monster 😬
Racism solved!
I don't see why an apology is necessary for *considering* a role.
I think she'd make a good she/male
Hahhhaahhaa
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: papermagazine - 🏆 409. / 53 Read more »
Source: Jezebel - 🏆 153. / 63 Read more »
Source: TMZ - 🏆 379. / 59 Read more »
Source: Cosmopolitan - 🏆 725. / 51 Read more »
Source: ForbesWomen - 🏆 477. / 51 Read more »
Source: MTVNEWS - 🏆 479. / 51 Read more »