press and holdAfter that, you can take a page from Marie Kondo’s book, thank Bixby for its service, and wish it well in its future endeavors. Broadly speaking, Google Assistant on the Galaxy Watch 4 is the best it's ever been on a Wear OS watch. However, that’s a low bar, and it’s not all rainbows and butterflies.
The main thing is that Google Assistant is much faster on the Galaxy Watch 4. That’s not surprising given this watch has a more powerful processor than every other Wear OS watch you can currently buy. The Assistant understood my commands, whether it was to message my husband, set a timer, or tell me whether it was going to rain today. I also didn’t have to wait with bated breath for Google Assistant to process things.
It’d be almost perfect if it weren’t for the fact that enabling Google Assistant is a major battery drain Between Assistant on the Galaxy Watch 4 and Siri on my Apple Watch Series 7, I’d say the performance is quite similar. Both are quick to wake, understand the majority of my mumbling, and take about the same amount of time to answer queries. However, Assistant has a slight edge when it comes to delivering useful search results. For example, I asked both Assistant and Siri to find me the closest auto repair shop.
It’d almost be perfect if it weren’t for the fact that enabling Google Assistant has been a major battery drain in the short time I’ve been using it. While testing the feature, I had the always-on display enabled and the watch listening for the “Hey Google” trigger in the background. After about two hours, it went from fully charged to 80 percent. At this rate, I’ll be lucky to make it to bedtime.
WHAT IS THAT ONE THING lol not clicking
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: DigitalTrends - 🏆 95. / 65 Read more »
Source: PhoneArena - 🏆 322. / 59 Read more »
Source: engadget - 🏆 276. / 63 Read more »
Source: ScaryMommy - 🏆 116. / 63 Read more »
Source: Gizmodo - 🏆 556. / 51 Read more »
Source: TexasObserver - 🏆 242. / 63 Read more »