decided Friday that it would not hear the case of a florist who refused to provide her services for a same-sex couple's wedding. The decision not to hear the case leaves in place an earlier ruling that she violated state anti-discrimination laws.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch said they would have reviewed the ruling, but four justices are needed for the court to hear a case.SCOTUS decided Friday not to hear the case of a florist who refused her services to a same-sex couple's wedding. The decision not to hear the case leaves in place an earlier ruling that the florist violated state anti-discrimination laws.
After that review, the Washington Supreme Court ruled unanimously that state courts did not act with animosity toward religion when they ruled Stutzman broke the state's anti-discrimination laws by refusing on religious grounds to provide flowers for the wedding of Rob Ingersoll and Curt Freed. Stutzman had sold Ingersoll flowers for nearly a decade and knew he was gay. But she contended his marriage went against her religious beliefs and she felt she could not provide services for the event.
Washington state law says businesses offering services to opposite-sex couples must provide the same service to same-sex couples.
Finally a win for human rights.
I would never refuse a same sex couple, as long as they can pay for services I don't understand what the problem is.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court rejects appeal from florist who wouldn't make arrangement for same-sex weddingThe US Supreme Court has declined to take up an appeal from a Washington state florist who refused to make an arrangement for a same-sex couple out of religious concerns regarding same-sex marriage. I don’t agree with the florist, but it’s a weird world to be sued over stuff like this. You just need to be smarter, use some other reason for your refusal. Dumb If you can’t leave religion or politics out of business, it’s best to not have a business then .
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Supreme Court Turns Away Florist Who Refused Same-Sex Wedding JobJustices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch said they would have agreed to hear the case and review the decision.
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Supreme Court won’t overturn ruling against business that refused service for gay weddingsThe court said it would not take up the florist's appeal, leaving the state court rulings against her intact and again ducking the hot-button issue. Cancel culture Red pepper in cake unconstitutional? Let them stew in their bigotry. It does however back up the case for companies to ban trump
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
SCOTUS will hear case for allowing public tuition dollars to go to religious schoolsThe U.S. Supreme Court is taking on the lawsuit filed by parents who want to send their children to Christian schools in Bangor and Waterville, Maine. This court will allow this to happen. There is no separation of church and state.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Editorial: Telling homeless people where they cannot camp will not stop them from being homelessResidents may be frustrated seeing encampments in their neighborhoods, but having police shoo people away won't solve homelessness, writes The Times Editorial Board. (via latimesopinion) opinion Instead of making corporations pay their fair share so many people won't have to be houseless. Easier to complain about the 'lazy' people. opinion Sanctuary city. Governor Newsom. He's too blame.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »