Firefighting Chemicals Are Dangerous for the Environment. Can That Change?

  • 📰 Slate
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 43 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 51%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Today’s chemical regulations (or lack thereof) can shape tomorrow’s dystopias.

In the early 2000s, chemical companies started phasing out early PFAS called PFOS and PFOA, replacing them with ostensibly less-bad alternatives. Newer “short-chain” PFAS are different than their predecessors on a molecular level, so existing research about risks did not as clearly apply. Many municipalities didNow, it appears many of the newer PFAS are still. Many fire departments will have to replace AFFFs again, this time with non-PFAS foams.

” are common. Vaughn’s skepticism toward the contents of her drone is warranted: The same thing could easily happen again.Reasonable people might expect chemical regulation to work something like drug approvals. To release drugs companies must first run—and pay for—study after study to clarify any side effects. For the U.S. chemical industry, for a long time, the process was

. For decades, most new chemicals entered the market with no required safety testing and no formal review by the U.S. EPA.Under the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act, chemicals were assumed safe until proved dangerous. The EPA had limited power even to request data. Once it understood health risks, it had to weigh them against financial costs. When the EPA banned asbestos in 1989, manufacturers sued to weaken the ban and won.Now, there is a glimmer of change.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 716. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Banana Boat Hair & Scalp Sunscreen recalled over benzene presenceHave you purchased this sunscreen recently? Banana Boat Hair & Scalp Sunscreen Spray SPF 30 has been recalled over the presence of benzene, a chemical that can cause cancer with repeated exposure at high enough levels.
Source: fox7austin - 🏆 594. / 51 Read more »

Oak Fire near Yosemite reaches 59% containment, Cal Fire saysCalifornia’s biggest wildfire of the season grew just 4 acres Saturday as firefighting progress steadily increased.
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »

Some Banana Boat sunscreen recalled due to traces of cancer-causing chemicalBanana Boat sunscreen was recalled due to the risk of exposure to a cancer-causing chemical
Source: abc13houston - 🏆 255. / 63 Read more »

Some Banana Boat sunscreen recalled due to traces of cancer-causing chemicalBanana Boat sunscreen was recalled due to the risk of exposure to a cancer-causing chemical
Source: 6abc - 🏆 250. / 63 Read more »

Some Banana Boat sunscreen recalled due to traces of cancer-causing chemicalThree batches of Banana Boat Hair & Scalp Sunscreen Spray SPF 30 have been voluntarily recalled by Edgewell Personal Care Company, the parent company of Banana Boat, after an internal review found some samples contained trace levels of benzene.
Source: ABC7 - 🏆 67. / 68 Read more »

Some Banana Boat sunscreen recalled due to traces of cancer-causing chemicalBanana Boat sunscreen was recalled due to the risk of exposure to a cancer-causing chemical What's new? There are others also. Safer to time your amount of sun than to use manufactured products.
Source: abc7newsbayarea - 🏆 529. / 51 Read more »