, one of the study’s lead authors, told the Post that Gmail’s spam filters demonstrated bias in their “default behavior” with newly created email accounts. However, once the researchers simulated user preferences by marking some emails as spam and leaving others in the inbox, Gmail’s spam filters adapted.
“What we saw was after they were being used, the biases in Gmail almost disappeared, but in Outlook and Yahoo they did not,” Shahzad, an associate professor at North Carolina State University, said.Google, for its part, claims the study has major flaws and states that Gmail does not have a political bias when it comes to spam.on the agency’s site poured in, with many fuming about the proposed pilot.“Swamp my inbox with political spam if you want me to switch to my Yahoo account full time.
Another commenter by the name of Kathryn Workman said they were opposed to thpilot and pointed out that they are already “inundated with unwanted emails, many of them political.” Workman added that they do not want more emails from political individuals and entities that they consider disturbing.“I am very literate and read political information daily. If I want additional information, I contact or sign up for emails from the sources I want,” Workman said.
Castañeda said Google will now “reflect on the positive and negative feedback received during the public comment period,” he said.“Our goal during this pilot program is to assess alternative ways of addressing concerns from bulk senders, while giving users clear controls over their inboxes to minimize unwanted email,” Castañeda said. “We will continue to monitor feedback as the pilot rolls out to ensure it is meeting its goals.
Email is just one giant spam catcher these days. It should be illegal to bombard people with this bullshit. I'd love to kick the guy in the nuts who decided ads at the gas pump were a good idea.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: DenverChannel - 🏆 239. / 63 Read more »
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: Medscape - 🏆 386. / 55 Read more »