The utilities commission’s plan wouldn’t do either of those things. Instead, it fully endorses the “cost shift” argument made by utility companies and others — that net metering leads to higher electricity rates for Californians who can’t afford solar.
Chhabra says the primary goal of net metering shouldn’t be to add as much rooftop solar as possible — it should be to meet California’s overall climate goals, which will require a lot of rooftop solar but also many other forms of clean energy. That includes large solar and wind farms that generate renewable power at a lower cost than rooftop systems due to economies of scale.
, but whose sole funders are the utility companies. Campaign spokesperson Kathy Fairbanks said the proposed decision “recognizes we can grow rooftop solar in California while taking steps to reduce inflated subsidies that have put an unfair cost burden on renters, seniors, disadvantaged communities and other working Californians who don’t have the ability or means to install rooftop solar systems.”, I talked with Brad Heavner, policy director for the California Solar and Storage Assn.
Then there’s the reduced payment rate for electricity exported to the grid. Heavner estimated a typical new solar customer would see overall compensation drop by $675 per year in Edison territory, $985 in PG&E territory and $1,290 in SDG&E territory. “I think 10 years is fair for people to get their money back,” Freedman told me. “Customers don’t need that subsidy forever to invest in solar. Once customers make their money back, everything is gravy on top of that.”
Sammy_Roth .Sammy_Roth what about GavinNewsom saying that the future of California should be decentralized? The californiapuc plan would do the opposite. SaveSolar
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Cosmopolitan - 🏆 725. / 51 Read more »
Source: TODAYshow - 🏆 389. / 55 Read more »
Source: TODAYshow - 🏆 389. / 55 Read more »
Source: bbchealth - 🏆 143. / 63 Read more »
Source: usweekly - 🏆 390. / 55 Read more »
Source: TODAYshow - 🏆 389. / 55 Read more »