and her attorneys have two options: Continue fighting the case and attempt a come-from-behind victory on appeal, or accept the verdict and ask for mercy from U.S. District Court Judge Edward Davila.
Rahmani pointed out that fraud cases typically don’t go to trial in the federal system and defendants will often take plea deals that come with several years in prison. Although it’s a defendant’s right to take a case to trial, a guilty verdict from a jury often comes with greater risk for a longer sentence.
In sentencing, the judge can consider aggravating factors – even the circumstances involving the counts Holmes was not convicted on, like risking patients’ health. The dollar figure may also come into play. The three counts she was convicted on total more than $140 million in losses for investors. And the same judge who’s sentencing Holmes dealt out nine and 12-year sentences for the couple involved in the famous Wendy’s chili finger scam back in 2006.Holmes’ other option may be to appeal the verdict – but the judge ran an ultra-careful trial and didn’t give her team much to contest.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: verge - 🏆 94. / 67 Read more »
Source: CoinDesk - 🏆 291. / 63 Read more »
What scientists say about Elizabeth Holmes guilty verdictElizabeth Holmes guilty verdict: Theranos case highlights the importance of peer review for biotech entrepreneurs, scientists say … +++ … blablabla, or name it bullshit. Sometimes, I prefer those manichaean absurd guys, true or wrong. This was just a 'brilliant' try to make money and business. Failed. Full dot. Like many others. Lies. Manipulation. Fake data. Name it the way you want. What I can’t figure out is how educated folk fell for any of her nonsense from day 1
Source: Nature - 🏆 64. / 68 Read more »
What scientists say about Elizabeth Holmes guilty verdictElizabeth Holmes guilty verdict: Theranos case highlights the importance of peer review for biotech entrepreneurs, scientists say 0.0 Peer reviews have their benefits but it is not infallible, and the future disruptors of healthcare need not have any Medical training Remember, the study below was also peer reviewed confirming Vaccines Prevent Infection. A disruption is coming. It wasn’t the science those old farts were looking at.
Source: Nature - 🏆 64. / 68 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Source: verge - 🏆 94. / 67 Read more »