Editorial: Whether or not Amy Coney Barrett gets on the Supreme Court, abortion rights should stand

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 78 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 35%
  • Publisher: 82%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Editorial: Whether or not Amy Coney Barrett gets on the Supreme Court, abortion rights should stand (via latimesopinion)

newspaper that they “oppose abortion on demand and defend the right to life from fertilization to natural death.” The more provocative second page of the ad, next to the signatures, said in part, “It’s time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. Wade.”

Although Barrett has never ruled directly on an abortion case, she was peripherally involved in a couple. In both cases, she signed onto dissents that urged the 7th Circuit to reconsider rulings that barred the state of Indiana from imposing additional restrictions on abortions — in one case on minors who’d obtained a judge’s approval for an abortion, and in the other on abortions done for reasons of sex, race or fetal diagnosis.

Those dissents are troubling enough. A more worrisome portent is her 2013 Texas Law Review article on when the Court should veer from precedent and overturn one of its own decisions. “I tend to agree with those who say that a justice’s duty is to the Constitution and that it is thus more legitimate for her to enforce her best understanding of the Constitution rather than a precedent she thinks clearly in conflict with it,” she wrote.

Roe should rank as a superprecedent because it guarantees a right fundamental to women in America, one that they have relied on now for decades. When the court has overturned a long-standing precedent in the past, it has often done so to grant rights, not take them away; witness the Brown ruling.

The Supreme Court is currently considering whether to hear a challenge to Mississippi’s ban on abortions after 15 weeks into a pregnancy. There are also four state bans on abortions sought for certain reasons that are making their way through appellate courts. All blocked at least temporarily from taking effect. All could travel up to the Supreme Court.

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

opinion Yes, infanticide is a mother's right...

opinion I get this impression that the Los Angeles times is a liberal liberal liberal newspaper

opinion She's totally qualified. But abortion should be a woman's choice even if im against it.

opinion LA times has no voting right

opinion This sick gag is this racist shrew and the other so called pro life crowd are only against white women getting abortions, they could care less about others, just like they don’t care about millions of alive kids in this country suffering.

opinion Ahahhhhhaaaaaaaaa (deep inhale) aaahhhhhhahahahah!!!!!!! scotus Trump2020 lulz

opinion Thanks to Harry Reid and the democrats. She will be confirmed.

opinion So even lat knows she can not be stopped

opinion Whether or not?! LOL! Ignorant opinion. She WILL!

opinion Let’s stop beating around the bush...the real issue isn’t abortion, it’s when is human life protected by law? Let the Supreme Court settle that and the abortion debate is moot.

opinion It's not just Roe v Wade, it's her stance on the A CA, ruling for corporations and she has already lied on her questionaire.

opinion Sorry you don't get to make the rules.

opinion Just say 'after.'

opinion The Supreme Court was meant to exist to determine the law. Not to push preconceived prejudices. She is unqualified, just like other Trump GOP choices to stack the court.

opinion 7 MINUTE QUARTER POUNDER CHALLENGE | NO DRINKING CHALLENGE ( McDonald’s)

opinion What I don't get is the outrage about an embryo that's unable 2 sustain life without the mother, and yet when people r taken off life support, it's compassionate, for the best, what God wants. If life is suppose to be so precious. Why don't they protest that?

opinion Babies in wombs disagree.

opinion Gay rights are up for a vote with her on the bench as well?!?!?

opinion No. Roe v Wade is a bad decision thay should be undone. States can decide for themselves.

opinion Whether or not? Hahahahahahahahahaha!

opinion

opinion Murdering preborn babies/Infanticide should be stopped immediately!

opinion Amy Coney Barrett is getting on the Supreme Court whether you like it or not. No force in the world can stop this. WTF up

opinion They might 'should' but they won't.

opinion Well no shit. But they probably won't. Is the point.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 11. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Amy Coney Barrett Is Too Irresponsible to Be on the Supreme Court'Barrett has become just another figurehead of “pro-life” hypocrisy, putting extremist views before the true sanctity of life and collaborating with the powerful few to the detriment of the many.' –DCampoamor DCampoamor Covid drug given to Trump developed using cells derived from aborted fetus You made more sense when you were hawking GigiEngle's Anal Sex Guide. Limecello A teen magazine tells you you're irresponsible. Like Gandhi telling you that you should eat more. Like Rush Limbaugh telling you to calm down. Like Susan Lucci telling you maybe you shouldn't get married to this one. Teen calling you on your behavior is serious. Ears open.
Source: TeenVogue - 🏆 481. / 51 Read more »

When are the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett?Confirmation hearings on President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, are set to kick off Monday, in what promises to be an intense Washington spectacle. SpeakerPelosi just stonewall the whole thing. One thing you could learn from MoscowMitch Everyone needs to be tested before the hearing starts. Graham just refused to be tested and his debate was canceled. Healthy people do not refuse to be tested.
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

Fauci calls Amy Coney Barrett ceremony in Rose Garden 'superspreader event''I think the data speaks for themselves. We had a superspreader event in the White House and it was in a situation where people were crowded together and were not wearing masks,' Dr. Fauci said. The virus is out , Fauci , grandstanding political hack . You had your quarantine - 40 days . The virus is smarter than you . Care for the elderly , the vulnerable , and promote hygiene , distancing and masks when you are breathing over another ,therapeutics and vaccines . Done Hate news not important Paging Dr Falsey!
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Amy Coney Barrett Rose Garden event was a WH COVID superspreader, new data suggestsAccording to data, that was released on Tableau Public by Peter James Walker, at least 37 cases of the new coronavirus were confirmed within 12 days after Barrett's nomination event on September 26. Newsweek reached out to Walker for comment. New data? Suggests? Ya think? Wonder how many unreported super spreaders there were from blm and Antifa riots
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

'Useful Idiots': Trump vs. Covid and 'Handmaid' Amy Coney BarrettJournalist David Sirota joins the show to talk Trump and Covid, Biden and the election, and how Eighties pop culture relates to today Awful Did they also defend child porn? Cause did. As usual the left continues with their lies 😒
Source: RollingStone - 🏆 483. / 51 Read more »