WASHINGTON — Democrats are poised to ditch Iowa and move up Michigan in their presidential primary calendar starting in 2024, according to several Democratic officials involved in the process.
“I want our primary process to reflect the direction of our party,” said one committee member. Michigan offers racial and ethnic diversity, as well as a mix of urban, suburban and rural voters, this person said, adding that “Iowa just doesn’t have that.” While Nevada is expected to retain its spot as first in the West, it would be a disappointment to its top political and party officials if it isn't first,in their attempts to supplant New Hampshire to become first in the nation.
Dozens of other states submitted bids to join the early states, which are given permission by the Democratic and Republican parties to hold their nominating contests before the rest.botched their caucuses As president and leader of his party, Biden’s opinion carries weight, even though most expect him to run essentially unopposed for the Democratic nomination in 2024.
If we want a fair election with choices the people want, this process must be changed. Going a few States at a time only allows politicians to control the outcome, not the voters. Primaries should be 50 States, Same Day, All Candidates. elections
No wonder.
Good news! All the media attention on a state that has almost no diversity. They should go to the back of the line.
👍
I will miss the Media Coffee Shop Interviews asking Republican MAGA voters about Best Dem Candidates.
Doesn't Iowa have a provision that essentially says they're primaries will be before any other state's?
excellent!🇺🇸
Iowa should be sent to the back of the field. Their caucus disaster is enough reason to do so. No more butter cow!
Good.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Source: dcexaminer - 🏆 6. / 94 Read more »
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »