The next Democratic presidential primary debate will likely be historic — but probably not for the reason Democrats were hoping.
. “I actually think voters realize ... that it might be more important to see how someone actually answers a question, and what their actual plan is, and how it would affect them, than if they get the best zinger in, or viral moment. It is what it is. I will survive.” “I don’t think it is necessarily good. I think we’re at a point [when] we’re really down to five candidates that have actual traction, and you have a lot of people auditioning for something else,” Chris Reeves, a DNC member from Kansas who is neutral in the presidential race, said. “I think it is probably the best you can make of it … [but] I feel sorry for those people who have to stand on stage and be silent for long periods of time.
A crowded 12-person debate stage — up from an already busy 10-person stage — could also change the incentives for the candidates on stage. More candidates means less speaking time all around, and past debate rules have encouraged conflict between the candidates.
Why not limit the debate to four topics and ask the candidates their top choices. Fewer people talking in greater depth about the issues they care about. - Climate change, income inequality, economic outlook or whatever. Make sure cand. Get to get their message across.
It's honestly bizarre how candidates like Steyer and Klobuchar are allowed to take valuable time away from the front-runners at this point. They're never, ever going to catch up. It's time to hear what the likely candidates have to say.
It's time for some of these people to lick their wounds and go home instead of muddying the waters. It's never been more important to do the right thing.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: SELFmagazine - 🏆 478. / 51 Read more »
Source: Refinery29 - 🏆 26. / 68 Read more »
Source: BuzzFeed - 🏆 730. / 51 Read more »
Source: ELLE Magazine (US) - 🏆 472. / 51 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: NYMag - 🏆 111. / 63 Read more »