The lawsuit was filed in San Diego federal court nearly three months after the city council voted 6-2 to deny the church's proposal for the All Peoples Church Light ProjectAll Peoples Church filed a lawsuit Monday against the city of San Diego that alleges the city council's rejection of its so-called megachurch project in Del Cerro violates federal protections for religious institutions.
The church project has been contested for more than six years, according to a member of Save Del Cerro, a community group made up of more than 1,000 residents. The critics opposing the project argue it would create safety hazards due to the increased vehicle traffic.“That curb is a blind curb," said Cristina Cotrell of Save Del Cerro in January after the city vote."'There have been so many accidents in that place.
A 6-year battle over a mega-church project in the Del Cerro neighborhood has finally come to end. NBC 7's Shandel Menezes has more on the community reaction and what the church had to say following the city's rejection of their project. Lead counsel Daniel Dalton said,"The law is clear. The city cannot discriminate against a religious use using different rules and analysis from a nonreligious project in a similar situation. Federal law protects churches from the abuse of government in creating different standards for a religious facility, which is what the council did in justifying its motion to deny the All Peoples Church Light Project.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: nbcsandiego - 🏆 524. / 51 Read more »
Source: SAcurrent - 🏆 607. / 51 Read more »
Best Restaurants in San Antonio | San Antonio Express-NewsA guide to San Antonio and the Hill Country's best dining and drinks
Source: ExpressNews - 🏆 519. / 51 Read more »
Source: nbcsandiego - 🏆 524. / 51 Read more »
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »