are a perfect demonstration of this ugly practice. The latest news, leaked out of a congressional inquiry into the pandemic’s origins, shows how these anti-“misinformation” police were not only illiberal but also dangerous.
Branding facts, opinions, or arguments as “disinformation” is a plea to wave the rules of free speech and open inquiry. When bureaucrats, politicians, editors, and Big Tech do this, they are saying that they are 100% certain that they are correct, those who disagree are dead wrong, and that exposing the public to the “wrong” opinion or facts will cause serious and irreversible harm.
Part of the reason we have free speech is that we think debate and inquiry are necessary, and that nobody has a monopoly on the truth. Part of the reason we limit government power and create spheres of individual liberty is that we believe the government can make mistakes and abuse power. Federalism is also partly a reflection of this intellectual humility.
This New York Times story on Robert Redfield's comments saying he thinks the most likely origin for the coronavirus is accidental escape from a Wuhan lab appears in Google search with the headline: "Ex-CDC Director Favors Debunked Covid-19 Origin Theory."“Baric testified that he had specifically warned Shi Zhengli that the WIV’s critical coronavirus research was being conducted in labs with insufficient biosafety protections.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: abc15 - 🏆 263. / 63 Read more »
Source: AP - 🏆 728. / 51 Read more »
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »
Source: PhoneArena - 🏆 322. / 59 Read more »