— blasted dictionary publishers for describing the word ‘beauty’ in ageist and sexist terms.
“She was a great beauty in her youth” is a phrase often used in dictionaries to illustrate the word, while “I was struck by her beauty” is another,“Seen through the lens of today’s society and values, the definition of beauty hasn’t aged well. The implicit ageism and sexism in the examples were born in a different time,” according to the letter.
The letter is addressed to “major English dictionary houses” but doesn’t name any specific publishers. The letter also doesn’t propose any specific alternative definitions for beauty, instead asking for a “review” and “update” of the definition “to be more modern and inclusive, reflecting today’s society and values.”
And what is the definition of beauty according to the woke mob?!🤔🧐🤔
Looks like Marilyn Manson in disguise as Rachael Maddow.
Our country is out of control! And look at NY illegals, they are laying in streets saying they will not move from there to the free locations free food, free clothes due to the activities telling them to revolt! These are illegals wrecking the high rise hotels and refusing help!
Shut the Front Door, Lady!
these rainbow karens all look exactly the same
And he cuts his own hair
That’s because she’s old and ugly
Ugly
Let's be honest she's not going to be a expert on the subject of beauty...
So if they are those things for screwing up the definition of beauty, then those same publishers should be accountable for changing the definition of 'woman' and 'girl' for political reasons.
That's because she's old and ugly...
Get the stick out your ass😂
Make it stop.
I accuse this lady of trying to monopolize 'frumpy'
Definitely not this
This person has had a chokehold on what is beauty and fashion standard while looking.... Welll.... Yea.... Be blessed ya.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: wwd - 🏆 24. / 68 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »