From the beginning of oral arguments on Monday, it appeared the Supreme Court’s conservatives had come to the bench with their minds set. They sidestepped the lack of clear facts in the case, brushed off worst-case consequences and diminished past rulings that would seem to disfavor a Colorado website designer who has refused to serve same-sex couples. Justice Samuel Alito was even prepared to invoke lines from Obergefell v.
But the decision was based on specific facts tied to anti-religious bias voiced by individual commissioners. In that controversy over the Masterpiece Cakeshop, the Supreme Court declined to decide whether a business has a First Amendment free exercise right or speech right, based on personal beliefs, to discriminate against a same-sex couple. In Monday’s chapter, the justices took up whether website designer Smith has a free-speech right to create a wedding website for same-sex couples.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
These Justices are our human right enemy and they are prejudices not only for this case for every thing and how about Jutice Thomas he should testifies he is so racist man !
Agenda news trying to attack the Supreme Court. Has nothing to do with law. You are trying to force your opinion.
Roberts plays the role of Al Pacino in Godfather III. Right when I thought I was rational, the radicals pull me back in!
this right here is the problem
They are evil liars! They all belong disbarred!
SCOTUSisCorrupt
One way to look at it n I don't hate anyone But marriage is n alway be between a man n a woman, all else is a abomination n against nature. The USSC should n will vote that way.
The liberal justices have no minds to make up.
No one should be able to compel me to celebrate their lifestyle, no matter how much it hurts their feelings.
Good :)
😉⏳⚖️
are you still hinging society to bow to these petty social issues for their vote when we have war and economic depression at the gates. I support gay rights, but it should not be anyone's main reason for voting.
Hossein Jalali, Iran Parliament member: bank accounts of women not wearing hijab properly will be blocked soon. The IR lacks enough oppressing forces, so it comes up with new tactics to put pressure on women. مهسا_امینی MahsaAmini IranRevoIution
Hossein Jalali, Iran Parliament member: bank accounts of women not wearing hijab properly will be blocked soon. The IR lacks enough oppressing forces, so it comes up with new tactics to put pressure on women. مهسا_امینی MahsaAmini IranRevoIution
If SCOTUS wrongly decides for a web designer they're in dereliction of their legal duty under the Constitution by violating the spirit of Constitutional law on the equality of all citizens-Remedy simple disclaimer for a public serving vendor customers message is not the vendor's
Is this article about reigniting the abortion debate? Amen
Because that ain't no marriage but a mockery of the institution of marriage
As if the left-wing judges don't arrive with their minds made up too.
Time will bring innovation, and innovation, in some people's view, is something that will not be done to the end, so it's half done.
Liberals are really going to have a rough 30 to 40 years, Where people's religious freedom and gun rights are protected
I don't see the issue here
Make America normal again. Please!
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: postlocal - 🏆 327. / 59 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »