Summary SCREENRANT VIDEO OF THE DAY SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT Steve McQueen and Paul Newman are two of the most iconic actors of the '60s and '70s, but they famously didn't get along and it got totally out of hand when they starred in a $203 million movie together. Newman was one of the most in-demand actors of the era, and few actors have been nominated so many times in a row without winning.
Paul Newman & Steve McQueen Had A Rivalry Over The Towering Inferno's Top Billing In the book Paul and Me, it was revealed how much Newman and McQueen hated each other, and it was all over top billing . In 1974, McQueen had thought he'd reached Newman's level, as he was in talks to star alongside the actor in the epic disaster movie The Towering Inferno. Nevertheless, that still wasn't good enough, as McQueen wanted top billing over Newman.
The Towering Inferno Had A Unique Solution To Its Actor Problem The producers had a creative answer to resolve the conflict over The Towering Inferno's top billing. On the poster for The Towering Inferno, McQueen's name appears first with Newman's name appearing second. However, Newman's name appears above McQueen's in a diagonal fashion. The alignment of the names on the poster looks awkward, but it achieved the impossible and both actors got what they wanted, almost.
The movie cost $14 million to make, and based on the movie's budget, even a $50 million gross would have been a huge success for the studio. Earning $200 million was no small feat and that performance is ironically largely thanks to McQueen and Newman onscreen together for the first time. With two of Hollywood's biggest movie stars in the lead roles, the movie was always going to be a hit.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: screenrant - 🏆 7. / 94 Read more »
Source: sltrib - 🏆 316. / 61 Read more »
Source: PsychToday - 🏆 714. / 51 Read more »
Source: PennLive - 🏆 463. / 53 Read more »
Source: dallas_observer - 🏆 453. / 53 Read more »
Source: njdotcom - 🏆 282. / 63 Read more »