Walensky said she has hired a senior federal health official outside of the Atlanta-based agency to conduct a one-month review to “kick off an evaluation“Over the past year, I have heard from many of you that you would like to see CDC build on its rich history and modernize for the world around us,” she wrote in the email. “I am grateful for your efforts to lean into the hard work of transforming CDC for the better.
Walensky seemed to acknowledge those criticisms in brief public remarks about the reasons for the reorganization.“Never in its 75-year history has CDC had to make decisions so quickly, based on often limited, real-time, and evolving science,” she said in a statement. “ … As we’ve challenged our state and local partners, we know that now is the time for CDC to integrate the lessons learned into a strategy for the future.
Unless Walensky, the Scarlett Letter, steps down it’s just a show and attempt to clean up (coverup) this mess they have created
EvacuateAUAFStudents
Yeah, next time they’re not even gonna pretend to take whatever the next pandemic is seriously at the start.
The CDC needs to stop infecting peoples with their covid
Wtf you charging money to read your garbage?
The republicans have attacked the CDC and demonized science since the start of Covid. Full stop.
And just in time for the November elections
You have to start somewhere & getting the month outside review will be a good start. As Hortez mentioned what Walensky came into was really a no win situation that desperately needed to be looked at & should have been before now. Shall see if Congess steps up as well w its part.
Like not making it a political tool and showing the public the data that's guiding it's decision that's a good start.
CDC was late to the game on Covid...there was a time when the CDC could be relied on the nip things like this in the bud...
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: ActionNewsJax - 🏆 436. / 53 Read more »
Source: BreitbartNews - 🏆 610. / 51 Read more »
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Source: bbchealth - 🏆 143. / 63 Read more »
Source: bbchealth - 🏆 143. / 63 Read more »