California Officials’ Filp-Flopping Triggers Restrictive 2020 Masking Rules For Businesses; Newsom Promises “More Nuanced” Announcement On Friday – Updated
-19 masking requirements should be at businesses in the state when it reopens next Tuesday. That’s aside from non-binding “guidance” issued by the state’s Department of Public Health on masking in the workplace on Wednesday and forgetting GovernorGavin Newsom
’s statement in May that there would be “no” masking mandates — aside from at massive public events — and then walking that assertion back one day later. Confused yet? If you’re not, you’re not listening.That last line is one of Governor Gavin Newsom’s favorite jokes about his own longwinded and hyper-parenthetical speaking style. The line is applicable not only because it’s accurate to the situation, but also because the flip-flopping decision making around masks in the state seems to be an outgrowth of the technocratic governor’s own discursive style.
Related StoryCalifornians Flock To Open Attractions On Memorial Day Weekend As Travel SurgesAccordingly, Newsom said about the masking rules on Thursday, “tomorrow join me down in Southern California. We’ll be making specific announcements on this front.” He then called the safety officials’ decision on Wednesday “encouraging,” and said he would “clarify” that ruling on Friday. headtopics.com
It was an odd choice of words given that, according to the Newsom administration’s own top health official, the safety board’s decision is binding, and there is already anspelling out the rules. Newsom’s assertion that he would be making his own announcements on masking Friday seem to call the board’s authority into question.
But let’s back up.On Wednesday, a Standards Board meeting of The Division of Occupational Safety and Health, better known as Cal/OSHA, took place, and it was a doozie. It is that board’s decision which allegedly will dictate Covid-prevention requirements at businesses, according to the state’s top health official, not Newsom’s orders of the CA Public Health Department’s new guidance. The three-plus hour public Zoom
meeting of the usually little-noticed Standards Board was a chaotic mess, according toreports.In the end, the Cal/OSHA board overturned its own ruling from last week. That ruling, in effect, would have required unvaccinated employees to wear masks while at work but allow vaccinated workers to doff their masks so long as everyone was immunized, as well.
With last week’s decision nullified, masking requirements revert topassed by the board eight months ago, when pandemic conditions were much more severe.Among the requirements now in place are the following:-All employees shall be separated from other persons by at least six feet, except where an employer can demonstrate that six feet of separation is not possible, and except for momentary exposure while persons are in movement. headtopics.com
-Employers shall provide face coverings and ensure they are worn by employees over the nose and mouth when indoors, when outdoors and less than six feet away from another personThere will not be another meeting of the Cal/OSHA group until June 17 — two days after Newsom’s self-declared reopening date — and any rulings it makes on that date will not go into effect until June 28. Unless, that is, Newsom’s announcement tomorrow somehow changes that.
PREVIOUSLY on June 9:California updated its masking guidance yet again on Wednesday. The news comes after a series of confusing announcements on the subject from state and federal officials and just hours before another announcement that may supersede the guidance issued by state officials.
The guidanceissued Wednesday by the California Department of Public Health says that, beginning June 15, fully-vaccinated people will be able to resume everyday activities without wearing a mask. Masks will be required for unvaccinated individuals in indoor public settings and businesses. Masks will also be required in some limited situations regardless of vaccination status. Those exceptions include public transit, schools and childcare centers (pending updated CDC guidance), healthcare and long-term care facilities, prisons, and emergency or homeless shelters.
Los Angeles County health officials announced shortly thereafter that L.A. will align with the State’s masking guidance.But there’s an asterisk.In workplaces, employers are subject to the mandates issued by The Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH), better known as Cal/OSHA and its Covid-19 headtopics.com
Emergency Temporary Standards(ETS) or the CalOSHA Aerosol Transmissible Diseases Standard. Those standards have not yet been finalized, even though Governor Gavin Newsom announced the state will reopen next Tuesday.A special Cal/OSHA Standards Board meeting will take place Wednesday night to discuss the just-announced guidance from the CA Department of Public Health. It is that board’s decision which will mandate business requirements, not the public health department’s new guidance.
California Health and Human Services Director Dr. Mark Ghalyreportedlysaid on Wednesday that the state’s new guidance is not meant to push the board in one way or another in its decision on required masking for employees. It is simply meant to explain the administration’s position with regard to the CDC guidance. But the timing of the release — just hours before the Cal/OSHA board meets — seems curious. It is, at the very least, likely confusing for California residents and businesspeople trying to make plans more than seven days out.
According to the new state guidance, in settings where masks are required only for unvaccinated individuals, businesses, venue operators or hosts are allowed to:-Allow vaccinated individuals to self-attest that they are in compliance prior to entry-Implement vaccine verification to determine whether individuals are required to wear a mask
-Require all patrons to wear masksOne important caveat: The CA guidance states that “No person can be prevented from wearing a mask as a condition of participation in an activity or entry into a business.”There are some individuals who are exempt from wearing masks, regardless of vaccination status. They include:
-Persons younger than two years old-Persons with a medical condition, mental health condition, or disability that prevents wearing a mask-Persons who are hearing impaired, or communicating with a person who is hearing impaired, where the ability to see the mouth is essential for communication
-Persons for whom wearing a mask would create a risk to the person related to their work, as determined by local, state, or federal regulators or workplace safety guidelinesPREVIOUSLY on June 1:Early last month, Governor Gavin Newsom assured Californians that masks were soon going away for fully-vaccinated residents. Asked by a reporter if there would be a mask mandate after June 15, the usually-loquacious Newsom
saidquickly, “No.” He then enumerated a few rare circumstances where masks would still be needed.The following day, the Governor qualified his assurance saying, “For indoor activities we still will have, likely, some mask mandates. But the hope is those will be lifted sooner rather than later.”
That Newsom got out over his skis is understandable. He’s facing a recall election and, like the rest of us, trying to interpretconflicting signalsfrom the CDC and President Biden.But a committee charged with setting Covid safety measures to the CA Occupational Safety and Health Standards (CalOSHA) Board, advises in
a new draft documentthat masking in the workplace should continue after June 15.The document says, in part, that “Employers shall provide face coverings and ensure they are worn by employees over the nose and mouth when indoors, when outdoors and less than six feet away from another person…” The primary exceptions to this rule would be “When an employee is alone in a room, or when all persons in a room are fully vaccinated and do not have Covid-19 symptoms,” or while “Employees [are] wearing respirators…”
The upshot of those strictures would be that unvaccinated employees would need to wear masks while at work. Also, the presence of one unvaccinated person in a room full of otherwise vaccinated employees would mean everyone has to don a mask. Employers may also be required to track who is vaccinated and who is not. Talk about peer pressure.
Additionally, CDC guidanceissued this weekendadvises unvaccinated people to wear masks “anytime you are indoors or outdoors with people who don’t live with you.”As for physical distancing, the CA recommendations say that, through July 31, 2022 “all employees shall be separated from other persons by at least six feet” unless respirators are being worn.
There is no suggested end date on the CA mask recommendations. They will be discussed at a meeting of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board Thursday morning. The seven members of that panel are appointed by Governor Newsom.Subscribe toand keep your inbox happy.Read more: Deadline Hollywood »
Decoding the Queen's colorful style
As Britain's longest-reigning monarch, the Queen is both a cherished and consistent part of public life -- her image synonymous with stability and tradition to the British people.
Who can stop wearing masks, and where: California's COVID reopening rules explainedWith California set to reopen its economy fully on Tuesday, wearing a mask will become optional in many public settings. Here are the rules. Hey ✋🤚 Please support us Please subscribe our channel disclosurepost It needs only 1sec Your 1sec and 1 sub means a whole world to someone ThAnk u :) 'rules' are meant to be broken.
Newsom recall will cost California taxpayers $215 million, state officials sayAn analysis projects the recall election against Gov. Gavin Newsom will cost $215 million, an amount that's likely to grow as more candidates emerge. Send the bill to California’s Central Valley: Bakersfield, Visalia, Hanford, Fresno, Madera, Tulare, Selma, Stockton—all of the ugly name towns. They’re the ones who had the most signatures. Keeping Newsom will cost billions. How about we shelter some homeless humans or animals instead?
California Announces It Will Require Masks For Unvaccinated People In Indoor Public Settings And Businesses After June 15, But That Could Change – UpdatedUPDATED with latest: California updated its masking guidance yet again on Wednesday. The news comes after a series of confusing announcements on the subject from state and federal officials and jus… that cleared it right up. /sarcasm
Wearing a mask could go from a sign of caution to vulnerability as California reopensWith California 's full economic reopening days away, there remains one question in many people's minds: To mask, or not to mask? Wearing a mask is acknowledging that the pandemic isn’t over and a desire to protect vulnerable people. There are also those who are vaccinated who still want to mask up because they've learned maybe it's a pretty smart practice overall. Look a flu numbers.
Newsom and California lawmakers approved to receive pay raise amid improving economyThe California Citizens Compensation Commission, which is appointed by the governor, voted 4 to 0 on Tuesday to approve the 4.2% pay hikes for state elected officials. this is terrible news Of course they are I really don't think legislators should receive salaries in most cases, maybe like $50k at the most
Meghan Markle’s estranged father Thomas breaks silence after duchess gives birth to daughter Lilibet DianaMeghan Markle’s Estranged Father Thomas Breaks Silence After Duchess Gives Birth To Daughter Lilibet Diana (via Fox411) Fox411 Dear God 😩 Fox411 Bless his heart. Meghan should try to mend things with him before he dies - with heart problems he could go like *snap* and there will never be a chance to forgive him. Weird to be writing book about fathers when H&M loathe their own. Fox411 Why you are giving him attention ? He doesn’t have a life please talk about something else