Boeing’s 737 Max flight tests underestimated risks, U.S. investigators say

  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 84 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 37%
  • Publisher: 82%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

The Boeing 737 Max problem that caused deadly crashes triggered multiple loud alarms that might have confused the pilots, the NTSB found.

Boeing Co.’s evaluation of the 737 Max system during development used an oversimplified test that didn’t anticipate the cacophony of alarms and alerts that actually occurred during a pair of deadly crashes, U.S. investigators concluded.

The way Boeing designed its flight tests was permitted under existing rules. But the NTSB concluded that those standards, dating back to 1988, weren’t adequate. The agency called on the FAA to require more realistic assessments of complex emergencies during certification testing. Schulze said that should be done before the Max flies again.

“However, we are concerned that the process used to evaluate the original design needs improvement because that process is still in use to certify current and future aircraft and system designs,” the safety board said. Both the Lion Air crash Oct. 29 and the Ethiopian Airlines crash March 10 occurred after a malfunction prompted a safety feature known as the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System to begin automatically and repeatedly pushing the planes into dives.Although news reports since the crashes have contained some information on Boeing’s flight tests and safety assumptions about MCAS, the NTSB report is the first official account of how it was certified.

At least part of the reason for those miscues is that the underlying failure — faulty sensors that measure the angle of a plane’s nose relative to the oncoming air — triggered multiple loud alarms that were potentially confusing, the NTSB found. Boeing hasn’t yet responded to the NTSB’s recommendations, but the initial indications are that the company is receptive, Schulze said. A special review by Boeing’s board of directors Wednesday said the company should work with airlines to “reexamine assumptions around flight-deck design and operation,” particularly given shifts in demographics and “future pilot populations.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 11. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Plane Tests Must Use Average Pilots, NTSB Says After 737 MAX CrashesFederal accident investigators called for broad changes in decades-old engineering principles and design assumptions related to pilot emergency responses, the first formal U.S. safety recommendations stemming from two fatal Boeing 737 MAX crashes. Well, of course. Just like the Sully movie ... You'll have the superiority and I'll handle the complicity!
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »

Boeing did not adequately consider pilot reactions in 737 MAX: NTSBBoeing Co failed to adequately consider how pilots respond to cockpit emergencie... Is it safe !! So I've heard. Well that’s kinda damning!
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Boeing assumptions on 737 MAX emergency response faulted: NTSBBoeing Co failed to adequately consider how pilots respond to cockpit emergencie... no matter what they gonna do, my family will never board this plain This is all reassuring😱 why You Should Not Give Up!!! via YouTube
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Boeing didn't adequately plan for pilot response to 737 Max system failures, NTSB saysThe Federal Aviation Administration is not ensuring Boeing is thoroughly evaluating how airline pilots will react when flight control systems fail on the planes they fly, the National Transportation Safety Board says. How deregulation and self-monitorung can kill.... Then bureaucrats responsible for all the deaths?
Source: cnnbrk - 🏆 393. / 55 Read more »

FAA misled Congress about its 737 Max safety inspectors, investigation findsThe FAA misled Congress about a whistleblower’s allegation that many inspectors performing safety assessments on the Boeing 737 Max airplane weren’t properly qualified, a government watchdog concluded. I read somewhere (Internet) that the software was outsourced to cut rate cowboys uninterested in quality control and needs to be rewritten from scratch. Well at least no one died... oh, wait, never mind.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »

How Boeing's compensation fund for Boeing 737 Max victims was decidedBoeing’s victim compensation fund will provide $50 million to be distributed to families of the two 737 Max crashes. With victims from 35 countries, this is what Ken Feinberg of the Boeing Victims Fund Administration calls “a real challenge.” Boeing made $8 billion in profits last year. $50 million is a joke. THEY SHOULD BE BROUGHT UP ON MURDER CHARGES.!! The EU will get a hold of Boeing before long.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »