— which would dramatically hike their monthly kick-in for system upkeep, and dramatically shrink their earnings for sending excess energy to the grid — the
The judge’s questions are quite technical, but center on how to introduce steady reductions in the credit rooftop solar owners get for the energy they export, as well as thoughts on overall consumption charges .
“The fact they are still considering a ‘solar tax’ is alarming,” said Dave Rosenfeld, executive director of the Solar Rights Alliance, by email. “Now we know for sure it is still on the table. What they are now contemplating is truly absurd. … This is just like taxing people for hang drying their clothing instead of running the clothes dryer.”
“I remain concerned that the commission is still open to a solar tax, which should be off the table. A solar tax is unjustified, unfair and threatens a crucial component of our state’s clean energy future. So-called ‘non-bypassable charges on gross consumption’ would mean charging customers based on the energy they create with the solar system they installed on their own roof. This is just another way to package up a solar tax.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »
Source: KPBSnews - 🏆 240. / 63 Read more »
Source: KPBSnews - 🏆 240. / 63 Read more »
Source: DCist - 🏆 518. / 51 Read more »
Source: ladailynews - 🏆 332. / 59 Read more »
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »