A federal judge on Tuesday issued a nationwide injunction against a vaccine mandate for federal contractors, ruling that President Joe Biden probably exceeded his authority by imposing the requirement. Judge R. Stan Baker, who's based in Georgia, temporarily blocked implementation of the administration after a lawsuit from numerous states and a trade group argued that letting the mandate take effect on Jan.
The White House indicated yesterday that it still expects to prevail in this case, and the Justice Department will continue to defend the underlying policy, but the injunction was a disappointing setback. But it turns out that this is more than just a story about the judiciary and a public-health crisis. As a political matter, it's worth noting for context that District Court Judge R. Stan Baker was chosen for the federal bench by Donald Trump.
In fact, if this dynamic seems at all familiar, it's not your imagination. It was just last week, for example, when Judge Terry A. Doughty issued
MaddowBlog Biden said at the Summit meeting that 'we will ' Continue ' to fight for Voting Rights !! Really !!! We, WHO ? He has done not one campaign to even Push the Voting Rights Agenda. It's like saying ' It's Not My Problem ' It's The Voters Problem ! Stack The Courts , Filibuster !
MaddowBlog Don't you long for the days when judges at least tried to be impartial?
MaddowBlog Isn’t the DOJ stronger then those GOP judges? What is the purpose of them going against a President?They have 2 have a very good reason 4 not mandating masks N vaccinates,we have a deadly pandemic,it should never b blocked!Those judges should b held accountable!Just jail them!!🧐
MaddowBlog Well know he appointed the most unqualified members of the bar some in fact never even tried a case….saw this coming…
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: THR - 🏆 411. / 53 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »