WASHINGTON - U.S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett’s comments suggesting she backed challenges to the Obamacare healthcare law do not ensure she would vote to invalidate it in an upcoming case, despite Democrats’ claims to the contrary.
The appointment of Barrett, an appeals court judge and former law professor, would give the court a 6-3 conservative majority. But the ruling might not be on ideological lines, and the law is unlikely to be struck down, legal experts said, with even some lawyers who backed previous Obamacare challenges saying the lawsuit lacks merit.
“If nothing else, the voters should be very clear about one thing: President Trump and his party and Judge Barrett will overturn the Affordable Care Act, and they won’t stop there,” Democratic vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris said on Monday during a campaign stop in North Carolina. “Chief Justice Roberts pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute,” Barrett wrote in the article about the 2012 ruling, which found that the penalty imposed upon people who do not have health insurance could be upheld as a tax.
The challengers “have a very uphill battle” on that point, said noted Supreme Court lawyer Paul Clement at an event last week hosted by Georgetown University Law Center. Clement represented the Obamacare challengers in the 2012 case. Based on Barrett’s record as an appeals court judge, it is unclear how she would address the specific legal issue in the case even though she voiced support for the previous Obamacare challenges.
Source: Healthcare Press (healthcarepress.net)
BS
She is a shill and you know it.
Obamacare no longer penalizes citizens for not enrolling (thanks to President Trump) so the entire issue is moot. The left is grasping at straws to include religious bigotry by many in the media.
Yeah it’s called stare decisis
Yes it is. Quit your bullshit. This is a mess of a nomination.
Wow, a Reuters report that goes against the Dems...
It doesn't matter if it's true, it only matters how many people they can manipulate by making them believe that it's true.
Lol k
American Taliban
Don't believe the bs, folks!
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Analysis: Trump has the votes in Supreme Court fight, but Democrats have the political edgeAnalysis: President Trump has the votes in Supreme Court fight, but Democrats have the political edge. - sahilkapur sahilkapur RETWEET TrumpIsOnDrugs DonJrIsAnAddict TrumpIsOnDrugs DonJrIsAnAddict TrumpIsOnDrugs DonJrIsAnAddict TrumpIsOnDrugs DonJrIsAnAddict TrumpIsOnDrugs DonJrIsAnAddict TrumpIsOnDrugs DonJrIsAnAddict TrumpIsOnDrugs DonJrIsAnAddict TrumpIsOnDrugs DonJrIsAnAddict sahilkapur The majority of Americans want to wait for the next president to choose. The Repubs seem pretty sure they’re going to lose so they want to ram this through. You will regret not listening to the people you’re supposed to be representing. That IS why you were put in Washington. sahilkapur No more than dear old dad is doing.Where is the REAL proof?
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Trump has the votes in court fight, but Democrats have the political edgeAnalysis: Democrats will use Obamacare to maximize their political revenge for Barrett&39;s probable confirmation. Lol. What political edge? Seriously, do you all believe the dems really have an edge besides the main stream media in their pockets? Last time I checked, repeating same bs again and again does not make it true or real. 3 REPUB SENSTORS ALREADY SAID THEY WONT VOTE IN FAVOR...SO NO THE GOP DOESNT.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
The health department's irregular ad campaignThe health department's $300 million campaign to 'inspire hope' about coronavirus is highly irregular and has raised red flags, according to a POLITICO report not even one story about NYT Trump taxes? PATHETIC That's a lot of propaganda, why not spend the money on actually fighting the virus✌️ why is this bullshit being passed off on us? Corrupt Covuto campaign should NEVER hit the airwaves. Imagine if realDonaldTrump had taken this seriously from the start. TrumpLiesPeopleDie
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Opinion | The GOP’s ObamaCare Self-SabotageFrom WSJopinion: Judge Amy Coney Barrett and the Supreme Court won’t vote to overturn the health law opinion She is being selected by Trump and his GOP minions to do just that. Oh, and win the election for Trump. WSJMurdochRag opinion Lol. Ok opinion Yes she will. That’s why Trump wrote his fake EO on the preexisting conditions—tryna fool the fools. And she will overturn RvW too. Stop lying.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Democrats seek to turn Supreme Court fight into referendum on ObamacareJoe Biden and his Democratic allies are seeking to turn Donald Trump's nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court into a referendum on Obamacare. Come on, CNBC. I expect more from you. Pahhhhleeeease. 医改未必好 Obamacare has nothing to do with health care. It's just another tax to support the ballooning government deficit. You spend fortune on insurance and get nothing in return. Why is the first question on enrollment about your income size?
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Biden says voters won't accept GOP 'abuse of power' in pushing Barrett's confirmationDemocrats are determined to exact a political price if Trump's election-season Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, is confirmed. “Payback” in this case is necessary defense of democracy. Ok payback is good. Let’s get additional justices in there too RevivalChurchService The Messiah is coming and turn away from all sins!REPENT and keep Holiness in life.
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »