Barrett concerned about public perception of Supreme Court

  • 📰 MSNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 14 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 9%
  • Publisher: 51%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

Supreme Court Justice Barrett expresses concerns that the public may increasingly see the court as a partisan institution.

Barrett was asked about that decision by students who submitted questions in advance and also asked about another recent decision by the court in which it refused to block a lower court ruling ordering the Biden administration to reinstate a Trump-era program informally known as theSeveral supporters of abortion rights demonstrated outside the Seelbach Hotel, where the private event was held.

Barrett described the court as a “warm, collegial place.” She said that after she was confirmed a colleague brought Halloween candy for her children. The first mother of school-age children on the nine-member court also spoke about balancing her job and family life.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Well it is! Since the changed during the depression, except for the warren court.

Her dense ass gave this speech at McConnell venue, introduced by McConnell after being steamrolled through Congress by McConnell- nope, nuh uh, no way is there ANY partisanship on the court🙄🙄🙄🤮🤮🤥🤥 forgot to mention Federalist Society. Try to sell it elsewhere!

Maybe she should resign then.

Tell everyone you have no grasp on reality without TELLING everyone you have no grasp on reality.

👏👏 WOW. You had a moment of our reality? I'm stunned.

Totally Non Genuine! SHE IS BOUGHT AND PAID FOR!!

You think? Maybe because the GOP blocked Obama’s choice and pushed through Miss Amy In overtime. Can’t imagine why she thinks she was nominated. I guess we will see what she does

It is...

YA THINK!?

Trump put you in there just for the reason that you will use your republican politics and it's working.

BS! Barrett knows she was given a seat on SCOUS by Republican power structure, for her anti abortion views & promise to reverse Roe v Wade & deny women the right to choose. Barrett is a GOP stooge & embarrassment to women’s rights movement.

Looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck… 🤷🏻‍♂️

Well that's what happens when you make a judgment that people know is not right . Then refuse to condemn a state law, that goes against a judgment that the past Supreme Court ruled on, that goes against a women's rights, Justice Barrett

But it is.

Abortion proves it is true 6 Catholics on Sur Court Catholics only 25 per cent of the Country- American Taliban

Does she mean she’s afraid the public will finally know that the Court is a Political institution?

Poor woman, she has a lot to learn.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Barrett, we don’t “perceive” Scotus is GQOP partisan, we know it is. Plus, you should have not accepted your partisan appointment.

JusticeBarrett is deploying the GOP favorite tactic, “Believe what I say, not what you see”. She chose a conservative function to push the lie that she’s not a political hack. That’s like an arsonist, gas can in hand, next to a forest fire, claiming that her gas isn’t flammable.

No joke Barrett. I wonder how you came to that conclusion? You and and the guy who likes beer clinched it. We need to expand the Supreme Court.

Big talk from someone who just decided the Texas law on behalf of the catholic church.

Not perception just reality!!!

And she would be right. It is partisan

Not a very bright lady. Most don’t get this though.

I wonder why. Seriously. Brain scan ordered for Barrett

What a Revelation!

It is

Our constitution is dead when the SCOTUS starts to ignore the specific precedent and amendments that are documented and decide cases based on their political leanings. That's exactly what has happened in the last year. Very frightening.

That ship has sailed.

For her of all people to make such a comment is a joke!

A glass eye in a ducks ass can recognize that! 🤬

Too late. How can it be anything but partisan ?

Barrett has taken her political partisanship to the Court. Unfortunately, she is 59 yrs old and will be a GOP judge for a long time.

Isn't it already is?

The court's refusal to block the Texas law 'unleashes unconstitutional chaos,' Biden said last Thursday, hours after the decision was handed down. The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit this week in an attempt to block the six-week abortion ban.

Now I wonder why she would think that?

then she should resign

Oh golly gosh! Really now! Why would the public do that?

EH! The audacity!

Because it is.

Sometimes the truth hurts. All of us.

Well, when did she wake up?

Passing Citizens United Decision that opened the floodgates to dark money in our politics surpasses looking partisan.

Duh

Nope, that what the media wants you too think. It's called propaganda.

It is, thanks to Trump.

Jeanius!

We do.

How many years of law school and sitting on various benches to figure that out?

Wow, how dumb was her statement. Really Amy?

That’s because it is a partisan institution now.

While at a partisan gathering. SMH

Didn't prevent her from taking a lifetime position that she is not qualified for, from a President that shamed his office, with the blessing of a corrupt Senate Majority Leader who blocked a top-notch Democrat nominee from the previous Administration. No, not partisan at all.

Maybe she shouldn’t have accepted a nomination from an impeached president while millions were already voting in an ongoing election that would oust said impeached president…

Is there a laugh emoji on Twitter?

Well that is just rich coming from her.

Wait, it's not already?

Lol because it is!!!!

And why wouldn't we see it that way when for the better part of the last 50 years, much of what the SCOTUS has done is not only partisan and agenda based but has protected and enabled any and everyone besides those who need their help the most. Where's the justice in that?

DUH

REMOVEBARRETT SHES JUST INTERESTED IN SAVING HER OWN TUSH NOT HELPING OTHERS. SHES GUILTY OF INTERFERENCE WITH ELECTION!!

See : Snow expresses concerns that the public may increasingly see it as white....

Oh, really How could that be?

Misleading headlin and doesn’t point out her career long bias at a McConnell event

As she should be. How else would the SC be viewed now!

Where did she deliver these remarks...

If only there was something she could do about that…🤔🤔🤔

That’s how she got in

Everything about her appointment was partisan.

Really? That’s a shock! Is she aware that her seat is the outcome of the partisanship? Of course, she’s smart enough to know that, but she still wants to verify her hypocrisy by addressing her concerns.are humans smart?

Ya think?

Nah..

Too late

Ha ha where does she live? Obviously in a parallel universe

Well bless her heart. Her nomination was a partisan political power grab. Ask Merritt Garland. She needs to act like an impartial justice but that's not going to happen. Blessherheart

Did she say this from the WH balcony?

Hypocrisy

Really? I wonder why?

The Supreme Court is now a partisan institution due to Justice Barrett. She was installed explicitly to make it a biased institution. See also Justice Kavanaugh!!

Yuh think that, Miss Handmaid?

She could resign, and preserve the dignity of the court.

Duh.

'Supreme Court Justice Barrett - speaking at an event honoring Republican leader Mitch McConnell - expresses concerns that the public may increasingly see the court as a partisan institution.'

While I have seen this article 3 times on my timeline just this morning, I think that assessment needs an “No sh$t, Sherlock” attached to it. Haven’t they always seen it as a partisan issue? That’s why Congress has fought so hard to keep certain nominees on & off of it.

We do

Right. Barrett will vote as an ultra conservative. She just wants us to perceive that her findings are judiciously impartial. Good try.

When Trump started to accuse judges of bias against him the same burst. He brought politics into every decision. It’s too late. Check back in 100 years.

và cũng tìm e, ngườ542i có 01 trái tim cho riêng a thôi

You have to be kidding! Barrett, this highly partisan Justice of the SCOTUS is afraid the SC is seen as too partisan? Now she's playing the victim card?! People will do anything to get their way.

They are

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Duh

Too late, she has confirmed that the SC is partisan, decisions that are not based on law or established laws but on religious GQP ideology.

How is that when they refused to look at evidence of fraud n the 2020 election yeah partisan towards Democrats

She should resign her illegitimate seat as a way to help with that.

hahahahaha no 💩

Everybody see’s what she still doesn’t, she’s playing stupid or is one 🤷🏻‍♂️

She's worried about politicization? She was introduced by Mitch McConnell at the McConnell Center. The reason she was appointed to the Supreme Court was to overturn Roe v. Wade. She is a political appointment whether she knows it or not. She's a Manchurian candidate.

Federalist roadie says what now?

That’s because that’s what the partisan politicians in Congress tell them all the time. The reality is our courts aren’t partisan and do their jobs. It’s too bad those in Congress don’t do theirs!

🙄🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 469. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Barrett concerned about public perception of Supreme CourtSupreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett says justices must be 'hyper vigilant' about personal biases, fearing the court will be seen as partisan. She really has been a true disappointment. What can anybody expect from a McConnel recommendation Oh… That's rich coming from a Trump dump on the court.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

Barrett Concerned Republican-Packed Supreme Court Seen As PartisanJustices must be “hyper vigilant to make sure they’re not letting personal biases creep into their decisions' she said Sunday. Trump chose her precisely for her personal bias. Like the other Republicans. Her words are meaningless. Thanks for giving one concerned white woman air time over the thousands in the future millions of desperate poor women faced with no choices
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »

Justice Amy Coney Barrett argues Supreme Court isn't 'a bunch of partisan hacks'In the wake of a controversial decision on abortion rights, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett told a crowd of more than 100 here that she doesn't believe the highest court in the land is politically driven. both can be true, they are political (since judges are appointed by politicians because of their views) and also not political, because of rule of law / precedent / common law. Justice Barrett's statement is only partially true. In the case of the Texas abortion law it wasn't politically motivated. It was much worse. It was a ruling based on religion. When will you report real news? Do your job !!!
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Worse Than Texas: The Real Threat to Abortion Comes Next MonthTexas’s near-total abortion ban is bad, but there's an even more serious threat on the near horizon: a direct challenge to Roe from Mississippi that may well succeed at the Supreme Court. jaymichaelson writes
Source: NYMag - 🏆 111. / 63 Read more »

History and science both support Mississippi's abortion law | OpinionMississippi's limit on abortion—which the Supreme Court will consider this fall—is supported by historical legal principles as well as the latest science.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »

Breyer calls Supreme Court's Texas abortion ruling 'very, very, very wrong'U.S. Supreme Court Justice Breyer calls the court's recent ruling upholding Texas' abortion law 'very, very, very wrong' in an interview with NPR. Good thing he only has one vote He's very very very right!
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »