’s Twitter feed. The latter is a noted leaker among the Apple blogs. The video shows a CAD design rendering of what we’ve already been hearing about the iPhone 15 Pro/Pro Max: that it will have solid-state buttons on the side rather than physical ones. They’ve been referred to as “taptic,” as they’ll offer some haptic feedback when the finger hits the area.
The renderings show a touch-friendly bar where the volume rocker usually sits on the left side of the iPhone. The mute button is also expected to go touch-only, although we’re not 100% sure based on the renderings, with the ability to tap and press to turn the ringer on or off. The jury is out on whether that would be as satisfying as the physical flick of a switch or would feel more like theup until now have pointed to four different iPhone 15 models, with two denoted as the Pro and Pro Max and two referred to as the regular iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Max.
If it does turn out to be the case that the Pro variants use the new taptic buttons, Apple’s “Pro” smartphone lineup will continue to offer early adopters the bragging rights of shouting “first!” over a new batch of features. It may also help Apple position the device as more durable than its predecessors—something the company has already done with the Apple Watch Ultra.
I like the buttons, especially for taking pictures
😳 👀 T10Bespoke
The screen will get removed from the 16, I've read.
But I liked the volume buttons ☹️
Pretty pretty dumb. It's like when they took away tactile buttons in cars in favor of touch screens. If you have to turn down your volume in a hurry, you can just do it without thinking now.
Not an apple fan but I do find the idea of removing the volume button interesting. I find that cases can often create issues with buttons on smartphones and is often frustrating. That said if the method for changing the volume is complicated then its a wash.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: BGR - 🏆 234. / 63 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: thedailybeast - 🏆 307. / 63 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: PennLive - 🏆 463. / 53 Read more »
Source: epicurious - 🏆 114. / 63 Read more »