Anti-abortion coalition asks Supreme Court to restrict mifepristone

  • 📰 NBCNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 61 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 28%
  • Publisher: 86%

United States Headlines News

United States Latest News,United States Headlines

An anti-abortion coalition is urging the Supreme Court to leave in place a lower court decision that would prevent patients from obtaining the abortion pill mifepristone by mail amid other new restrictions.

by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that would suspend several regulatory decisions by the Food and Drug Administration since 2016 that made it easier to obtain the drug.

They also dismissed the government's"sky-is-falling argument" about the implications of allowing the lower court ruling to go into effect. While the FDA has warned of regulatory chaos, the anti-abortion coalition's lawyers say that older regulations dating back to 2011 could immediately go into effect if the Supreme Court rejects the government's request.ruling on hold Friday

To win, the Biden administration would need the votes of at least five of the nine justices on the court, which last summer in a 5-4 ruling overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade ruling, which said women nationwide have the right to obtain abortions. But the appeals court allowed separate elements of Kacsmaryk’s decision to remain in place. If those parts go into effect, the FDA’s decision in 2021 to allow mifepristone to be distributed by mail would be suspended, as would the 2019 decision that approved a generic version of mifepristone, which is made by GenBioPro.

A federal judge in Washington state added a further wrinkle by issuing a preliminary injunction in a different case barring the FDA from “altering the status quo and rights as it relates to the availability of mifepristone.”

Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

You mean the forced birth coalition? They can eat sht.

In 2000 when pill first introduced & until 2016 Doctors administered it & not by mail.

Who stands to make the most money off of this? That might be a clue to what's going on!

Can someone explain to me a non American, can you just travel out of state and get an abortion? Or is that a crime of some sort?

Most really don't understand how important proper usage of this medication is. It should never be allowed to be dispensed through the mail.

'Anti-life group striving to make ALL abortions - no matter the reason- far more risky, complicated, and painful by requiring surgery... just because they're religious fanatics that want to control everyone else.'

Oh no, you can’t kill your babies through the mail anymore.

This anti abortion coalition needs to put more effort into stopping men from ejaculating. Behind every abortion is a man who shouldn’t have ejaculated. So if they’re really passionate about stopping abortions… perhaps stop the actual cause

Murder by mail! Nice job!

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 10. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Anti-abortion groups urge US Supreme Court to restrict abortion pillThe U.S. Supreme Court should restrict the availability of the abortion pill mifepristone, anti-abortion groups challenging the medication's federal regulatory approval told the justices in a filing on Tuesday, urging them to implement curbs ordered by a conservative federal judge in Texas. Take a pill to prevent a baby, not one to kill it. Hahah after 23 years . Like saying Tylenol isn't good either lol 'Anti-Abortion groups urge the Supreme Court to sanction the murder of women by neglecting their health & forcing them to carry high risk pregnancy' - there. Fixed your headline
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Supreme Court to weigh case that could challenge U.S. anti-fraud lawThe Supreme Court today will weigh a case that could challenge the U.S. government's anti-fraud law. Billions of dollars are at stake in the case, which pivots around the False Claims Act.
Source: axios - 🏆 302. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court may be open to another legal route to cancel student debtThere's another legal route Biden can use to cancel student debt, and the Supreme Court's latest move shows the justices could be open to it This would make a lot more sense if we didn't have trillions in debt and weren't on the cusp of WWIII. Also, the interest on the debt is about to overtake the amount of taxes coming in.
Source: BusinessInsider - 🏆 729. / 51 Read more »

New York Stockpiling Abortion Pill as Legal Fight Heads for Supreme CourtThe nationwide rallies come after the U.S. Supreme Court intervened Friday to delay rule changes that would have limited the way the abortion drug mifepristone could be used and dispensed, to give itself more time to review the matter more thoroughly.
Source: NBCNewYork - 🏆 270. / 63 Read more »

Republicans scramble for winning message on abortion after Supreme Court’s ruling on RoePro-life activists said Republicans who attack the issue head-on win elections and those who ignore or avoid the issue lose because they allow opponents to define them. This is a favorite approach of fake-moderate theocrats like David French -- if only the broodslaves knew how much we love them and the children we would force them to bear, they'd give up their rights instead of insisting on them! That's like a restaurant owner trying to figure out which free side he should offer with his new sh-t sandwich to get people to try it. The winning message is WE DO NOT MURDER BABIES.
Source: WashTimes - 🏆 235. / 63 Read more »

Iowa Supreme Court rejects Gov. Kim Reynolds’ move to dismiss public records suitThe court in a unanimous decision rejected Reynolds’ argument that her office wasn’t obligated to respond in a timely matter to record requests and that she could avoid the state’s open records law by simply ignoring the requests.
Source: chicagotribune - 🏆 8. / 91 Read more »