with aggression and bluster largely served its apparently intended purpose of muting substantive conversation. But there was one moment in which Trump made an important and unsettling point, revealing his disdain for accepting the results of the election should he lose — and encouraging his supporters to take a similar approach.
This is false in a few ways. Poll watchers were prevented from observing voting in Philadelphia not because of some anti-Trump conspiracy but because, much as the president hates to admit it, the country is that there had been rampant fraud in Philadelphia in the 2012 contest, which is not true. Then, as now, he asked his supporters to go keep an eye on things.That, by itself, is alarming. There is a utility to having poll watchers in place, people trained to track voter turnout or, for those with particular expertise, to assist those who might need help casting a ballot.
To Trump, this is a sign of Democrats “cheating.” His bar in that regard is low; earlier, he had suggested that Democratic states were changing the rules to hurt him.This is a remarkable claim from a sitting president. Voting is a local act, which the president can’t directly affect . But it is still the case that if Trump sincerely thought that the election were being rigged, he could use the levers of power at his disposal to root out bad actors and criminal acts.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: TMZ - 🏆 379. / 59 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: Variety - 🏆 108. / 63 Read more »
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »