Graham raises abortion, Barrett says she’s never imposed her personal choices on others
Committee Chairman Sen. Lindsey Graham speaks during the confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Oct. 13, 2020, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C.In an attempt to allow Barrett to clearly say she would separate her personal views from her responsibilities as a judge, Graham asked Barrett if she could decide on cases involving guns, being a gun owner, and cases involving religion, being a devout Catholic.
Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett arrives to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the second day of her Supreme Court confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill, Oct. 13, 2020, in Washington, D.C.
Source: Law Daily Report (lawdailyreport.net)
You can always count on Rich the dick durbin to blatantly flaunt his ignorance of the law (felon voting and gun rights) then follow up with blatant demo spin and outright false statements. Even people in Illinois that support his party just laugh and roll their eyes at this guy.
BRAVO DEMOCRATS U ARE FOR THE PEOPLE. BRAVO DEMOCRAT MISTER WHITEHOUSE. PERFECT EXPLANATION OF DIRTY CORRUPT LAIRS REPUBLICANS LAWMAKERS. LAIRS AND CORRUPT JUST LIKE TRUMP HOAX THE LAIR. THANKS MISTER WHITEHOUSE FOR EXPLAINING TO AMERICANS THE WAY THE TRUTH HOAX BLIND US. THANKS
durbin
It shouldn’t take 2 adopted kids from another country for you to find it offensive
Yet she’s not sure that a supervisor calling an employee the N-word constitutes a hostile work environment. Trump picked her right off the “very fine people” list of SCOTUS noms 🙄
7 Exactly how she should answer!
Great....love judge amy
ACB said, “We are government of laws not of men” wow, what a unique concept. The Jaycee creed I repeated for years said this. We have a constitution on which laws should be based. Dems hate this concept. Dems act as if the ACA is the only law that counts.
“Death”
Durbin, Ask her if she's had 'The Talk' with her Black Children most Black Parents have with their Children about them interacting with the Police, then ask her what she would tell them. !!
Given that I have a beating heart, that was very, very personal for my family.
How does she have, 'the talk' with her black children as they become teenagers?
Guessing the conversation went something like this: 'Someday, if you commit a petty crime, mommy might have to put you in jail for 20 years honey'
RSS is terrorist organization
So according to Barrets ruling a Felon has no right to Vote but has a right to by an AR15 and AK47.. Good point Durbin, she had that Trump dear in Headlights moment..
yet you enable the guy that doesn't think it is a problem?
She's right, it is a personal when some of your family members a of black decent.
There is a reason they call him Dick!!
Oh, Crap she just Coughed!!!
सनातन से बड़ा और कोई धर्म नहीं -- अमेरिकन प्रोफेसर सनातन पर गहन खोज कर रहे हैं। प्रोफेसर ब्राइन ने कहा कि वीते ढाई दशकों में मैंने सनातन को जितना पढ़ा और समझा उसका सार यही है कि जीवन को संचालित करने की सनातन से बेहतर कोई और व्यवस्था नहीं।
7 That reply is known as the “Ginsburg Rule”.
ABC (CNN Jr.) refuses to show how people come out for Trump and don’t for Biden. 30,000 cars at the Cuban rally. You must not like Cubans. Here is the rally last night. Show the truth.
He’s not wrong. Trump makes it very hard for people to do their job by the way he tweets and what the content in his tweets and retweet’s.
I would be very interested to hear Judge Barrett’s opinion on the DOJ providing legal defense against one of Donald Trump’s rape accusers
Sen. Durbin: 'take us seriously!!!' ........ 'now I'm going to read you some tweets'.....
I am an expert in Facebook marketer. Able to promote any service or product worldwide. If you need my service then click this link.
'ramming through a judge at the last second before an election while the entire metro DC area is infected with a deadly virus isn't political!'
I think once Ami moves to strike down Roe v. Wade, rape is going to go way up
It's always a conspiracy with the democrats.
She should be asked if she support evolution of countries
Probably not the best statement she should be making in this political climate. I would think she would want to support Americans rights to want to be equal?
Therefore Amy agrees with Scalia, marriages can only be BETWEEN A Man and women. NEVER SAME SEX MARRIAGES ...no more gays rights for 40 years.
GMA Ginsburg doctrine, you guys are going to bash her for following exactly what Ginsburg did. I doubt Ginsburg would have gotten any Democratic votes then.
GMA In other words. She will repeal LGBTQ+ protections.
MUST WATCH. SPREAD LIKE FIRE. BENGHAZI BIDEN/HILLARY/OBAMA COVERUP.
She lies.
The commentary here aptly demonstrates that most people don’t get the purpose of the Supreme Court.
She has committed to it in her own thinking! That is enough!
Be ok if this man could read properly 🙄
I don’t trust her
Looking forward to when it leaks that she did exactly that and committed perjury but absolutely nothing will be done about this because our government is broken
This is one of those things that sounds like something but is actually nothing. The senators don't need pre-commitments to guess how she would rule.
Sociopath says what?
Duh
Her pants are on fire
Oh ok then
As if she will tell the truth here 😼
Did anyone ask her if she did a *wink nod* when trump asked her if she would overturn ACA? Let’s be clear, racism is the only reason republicans want to overturn it. They can’t stand that they failed to stop Obama so now they want to undo his accomplishments.
bad day of libs
Feinstein should have said, You’re a No for me.
Vote Biden!
Make no mistake. This one is an evil one
She would rather show us with her actions based on her beliefs🙄🙄🙄🙄
Don't ask her any questions! You'll make her sound like she belongs on Fox. We WANT off the cuff answers. We want to know WHAT YOU THINK like right NOW. Not after studying the answers and then taking the test.
Translation: 'I know exactly why I've been nominated and can't wait to rule the way Republicans want'
Not even 3 years experience as a judge? Is that right?
To put things straight forward - she is not answering any questions from Democrats but so comfortable with republicunts questions.
Curious if Judge Barret could give an opinion on an U.S. Senator having a Chinese spy as an employee for 20 years. Hypothetically speaking of course.
All they have proven is that they expect a Judge to break code for them and make a choice based on the individual's beliefs. Thank goodness she's a Judge with Honor.
Will she ever answer any question 😂
Christ! What’s the point? She’s not going to admit to being a hater.
Like other Republicans; she doesn't have a grasp on transparency. Instead, she sees being open as a violation of her right to keep her ideals private. The opposite of transparent.
👍
These democrats are making themselves look SO FREAKING STUPID AND TRANSPARENT, THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE MAKING SURE THAT AMY WILL RULE EITH THE LAW, BUT THEY DONT WANT THAY, THEY WANT HER TO RULE WITH THEM, AND THE BULLSHIT THEY TRY TO PULL IS AGAINST THE LAW MPST OF THE TIME!!!!!
Why not? What are you afraid to admit? The question should be 'Why do you give a shit what others do in their own homes or with their own bodies?' Don't like same sex? Don't do it. Don't agree with abortion? Don't have one.
Know the views of a judge is irrelevant. They interpret laws
She’s another Trump puppet!!!”
Don’t have to read much between the lines to figure out her opinion.
People, RE-ELECT TRUMP. As God allowed Christ crucifixion 4 your salvation, so Trump got Covid-19, for YOU. It's not about Trump's morals, etc., but your FREE Worship (Isis, Yazidi, Christians, Boko haram?) Hear 'Zion Train' Bob Marley's song. Mobilize!
Well...I'll just have to try a similar answer at my next job interview. 'Well, I'm applying for this job and if I give you answers I may sound like I researched and prepared but I don't think you want me to actually answer, so...GO FISH!'
But now she can answer a similar question from senile ChuckGrassley referring to the case as legislative history? Isn't Obergefell v Hodges also LegislativeHistory?
It doesn't matter how she feels about it what matters is what the Constitution says. If she's going to judge based on her personal biases she has no business being a Supreme Court Justice.
Sounds like she disagrees. I mean that’s exactly why she was chosen
Why not
Wow, that was a great answer!
In other words, she would do whatever Trump demanded.
And as Justice Ginsberg has stated as a nominee , one should not hint, or state any preference whatsoever
ATTENDED Trump College DEFLECTS not answer Class 101
ACB making Feinstein look feeble, old, and out of date !!
That's a disgraceful and disqualifying answer. But of course, if she were ready to answer 'no', then Trump never would have appointed her.
I watched this hearing for a half hour and am amazed at her ability to dodge each and every question with total nonsense. She has no opinion at all and sounds like a well rehearsed puppet. I fear for the US.
OMG. She really said this? Seriously? Constitutionally that election cannot be changed. She's lying. And lying badly I might add.....
Like her or not, that’s actually a great answer.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Jezebel - 🏆 153. / 63 Read more »
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »