Scores died in the floods across Henan province, some of them in subway trains and road tunnels that remained open long after meteorologists issued a red-alert warning of lethal weather. China’s propaganda machine is on the defensive. It has cast this terrible human tragedy as a “sudden act of nature”: an exceptional event that could not be planned for.
Talking to locals in Mihe on a recent weekday, Chaguan met many who called the floods a one-off event. The fatalists included the young couple who owned that shipwrecked Toyota Corolla, encountered as they fished in its waterlogged interior for valuables. There is no reason to think such a disaster will strike again, said the young man, examining a weed-covered set of keys and a bank card. It was “a once-in-a-1,000-year rainstorm”, he declared.
If opinion in Mihe is not monolithic, it is distinctively Chinese. Those calling for climate action often went on to describe large-scale engineering works, of the sort dear to party bosses. A shopkeeper drying mud-encrusted stock in the sun suggested that the Sishui’s channel needed widening. “The river is too narrow, the water could not drain away fast enough,” he ventured.
You send a message now, tomorrow America will disintegrate, and I will not believe your message.
🔥BossBabyLink ($BBLINK)🔥 The new token that rewards holders in Chainlink 🔥Many influencers on board 🔥 Active community 🔥LP locked for 6 months. 🔥 3 days old 🔥 Listed on CG / CMC coming Telegram: BabyLinkOfficial
What about India and the rest of the developing world? Why so much focus on China?
the world needs the West to reduce their per capita emission ASAP to the same level as China to save the world.
l'm super excited right now i can now pay my bill and take good care of my family thank you trade_with_james715 for bringing happness to my home with just an investment of $ 500 I got $ 5,600 in 7working days I'm now debt FREE !! ! MrsJamesTricia
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Newsweek - 🏆 468. / 52 Read more »
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Source: Forbes - 🏆 394. / 53 Read more »
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Source: Variety - 🏆 108. / 63 Read more »