The last time Washington debated how much stimulus to inject into a moribund economy, the mantra inside the White House was: The more, the better. It was 2009, the nation was reeling from the mortgage meltdown and President Barack Obama’s top economic adviser, Lawrence Summers—a physical as well as intellectual heavyweight—kept telling colleagues that worrying the government would spend too much money was like worrying he would lose too many pounds.
Nevertheless, stimulus fatigue seems to be spreading on Capitol Hill, especially among Republicans, and negotiations over the next package seem to be going nowhere fast.
Meanwhile, if there are rifts over the details among Republicans, there are chasms between Republicans and Democrats. Republicans want to scale back the just-expired $600-a-month expansion in unemployment benefits that Democrats inserted into this spring’s CARES Act, while Democrats oppose liability protections for businesses that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has declared a prerequisite to any deal.
“There’s an incredible temptation to say: ‘OK, we did some stimulus, things seem to be getting better, let’s move on,’” says Jared Bernstein, an Obama White House economist who is now advising Joe Biden’s campaign. “But as we saw in 2009, it’s incredibly misguided.”his aide Jason Furman met for coffee with the left-wing gadfly James Galbraith, one of 387 economists who had signed a letter urging Congress to move “quickly and decisively” on a $400 billion stimulus.
Fiscal stimulus does increase budget deficits, and there was some concern inside Obamaworld, especially from budget director Peter Orszag, that too much deficit spending by a Democratic president and a Democratic-controlled Congress would send a dangerous signal to markets about Democratic profligacy. But depressions that ravage household incomes, crush business profits and scuttle tax revenues are much worse for budget deficits.
In retrospect, Bernstein thinks he and his colleagues may have overemphasized the statistical evidence that the worst of the cataclysm was over, while underemphasizing the desperate need to continue to support struggling families and businesses. The recovery was real, and it would continue throughout Obama’s presidency and well into Trump’s, but by historical standards it was somewhat tepid.
As Summers said, the virus has created an even deeper crater than the Obama team had to try to fill. When Obama took office, his team believed America faced a $1.8 trillion “output gap” between its pre-crisis and post-crisis trajectories, and the Recovery Act filled less than half of it. Bernstein sent me nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projections suggesting that even after the initial coronavirus stimulus, America now faces a staggering $7.
Yeah Obama handed out billions of taxpayers money to universities you name it it’s people that have unions people that vote Democrat he handed out billions and no he did not have shovel ready projects and no it didn’t actually trickle down to the every day person
Didn’t these idiots approve $1.9 trillion in tax cuts for corps and the rich just two years ago? And now they claim we can’t afford help for the most desperate in the country. Typical GOP priorities. DitchMitch GOPTaxScam
Yes, be liberal during the crisis, but then scoop back up the excess from the wealthy when it passes.
The problem is more about where it is applied. Handing stimulus to 'small' law firms, hedge funds, investment firms, country clubs rather than people who will spend in the domestic economy will destroy us with unfathomable debt for generations to come.
Give me a break! Obama bailed out banks not the people - how is he any different than Trump?
Maybe if some of this actually went to people in need we would not need as much. Instead Trump and the GOP have funneled money to the wealthy such as Peter Brant who used his PPP loan to help buy a $47 million Palm Beach estate.
Again do better! It's REPUBLICANS who are repeating the same old mistakes.
I don't think that anyone who is a 'conservative Republican' should be, or have been, allowed to get unemployment/stimulus checks. It is a federal/socialist hand out isn't it? And they want Government to stay out of their lives. Right?
Feed a cold, starve a fever?
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »
Source: Food52 - 🏆 113. / 63 Read more »
Source: billboard - 🏆 112. / 63 Read more »
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »